Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

A few individuals claim that no considerable garbage of the houses is reprocessed. They declair that the single to rise repeocessing is on state to introduse it a legal requrement. Waste from homes is unhygienic for recycling it strict laws and department is required. In this essay, i will discuss on laws needed for reproducing waste.

On the one hand, claim of many people not a lot of garbage is recycling additionaly team is also required for it. Specially in big cities people through their waste products in garbage and it do not recycle in addition it is harmful for society. For instance 3R system is required in all places in wich renewable products do seprate and use it again and again. Advantages of it on expenses it reduce budget for making new products.

On the other hand, people say it is dutey of government but it is truh that only rules can not change whole scenario it is alaso responsibility of publick they through recycleable goods in seprate basket and dotn through in anywhere. For instance, governmen instal basket everywhere but people dont throug garbage in these baskets in that situation local individuals are responsible and in many countries have faced that problem in wich people do not compremise with adminestration.

In conclusion, we need to work together to overcome this serious problem. From my perspective, i partily agree with the statement government should introduce laws make industry for recycling but we need to persuade our local people to follow regulations for better socitey

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address the question by discussing both government rules and the public’s responsibility, and your conclusion gives a partly supportive position: “we need to work together.” However, the extent of your agreement is not consistently clear. The opening suggests strict laws are required, while the conclusion says you “partily agree” and shifts to laws for industry, rather than clearly explaining whether household recycling should be legally required. Your examples—the 3R system and bins that people do not use—are relevant, but their connection to the need for laws is not fully explained. Develop one or two reasons in more detail, such as how penalties or collection systems would change household behaviour, and state your position clearly throughout.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting different perspectives, and a conclusion. The contrastive signposts “On the one hand” and “On the other hand” help readers follow the broad organisation. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow: the first body paragraph moves from low recycling to city waste, then the 3R system and cost savings without clearly linking each point. Some connections are also unclear, particularly “claim of many people not a lot of garbage is recycling additionaly team is also required.” Use clearer topic sentences and explain how each example supports the paragraph’s main point. More precise referencing and fewer loosely connected clauses would make the argument easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You use some task-related vocabulary, including “recycling,” “legal requirement,” “3R system,” and “regulations,” so the topic is generally identifiable. However, the range is limited and many spelling errors or inaccurate word choices make the writing difficult to understand in places: “reprocessed,” “reproducing waste,” and “renewable products” do not express the intended recycling ideas precisely. There are also awkward combinations such as “introduse it a legal requrement” and “make industry for recycling.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and check spelling carefully. For example, use “recycle household waste,” “introduce a legal requirement,” and “recyclable materials” consistently. This would make your meaning clearer and give you more flexibility in discussing the issue.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentence forms, and the overall meaning can usually be inferred. However, control is inconsistent, especially in longer sentences, where missing or incorrect grammatical links make ideas hard to follow. For example, “Waste from homes is unhygienic for recycling it strict laws and department is required” combines clauses without a clear structure, while “people through their waste products … and it do not recycle” has problems with verb form and agreement. Articles, plurals, and sentence boundaries also need attention. Practise building accurate simple sentences first, then connect them with conjunctions such as “because” or “although.” Check that each sentence has a clear subject and correctly formed verb before adding further detail.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.