Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

A substantial amount of waste is mostly produced in our homes daily. Some individuals believe that recycling procedure of our household waste is not performing enough. They thought that government should take legal actions and imply rules in order to encourage recycling and its the only way.

Household waste can be used for many things by recycling it in a proper way for example the plastic bottles and glass bottles of cold drinks or juices can be recycled to make new bottles, used notebooks and papers can also be recycled for new ones and debris of our cattles like cow and goat can be processed for making fertilizers . But in developing countries people are unaware of how to properly collect the waste by segregating it properly in different categories so it would be recycled easily. Recycled waste requires the low cost, energy and time .

I agree that government should make strategies to organize awareness programs for people to educate them how to properly deal with waste instead of just throwing it away randomly. Moreover, the government should make strict rules and regulations for residents of a country and also install separate waste bins for segregation of different kinds of waste. Otherwise people would not take it seriously and follow their older practices. For example, if government starts charging fine from those who throw their garbage randomly then next time they would be more responsible and must follow the rules.

In conclusion, government should imply strict rules for their residents to encourage them in order to use the waste in more productive way , so that it will save cost, resources, time and energy.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address the central question and make your position clear: you support government action, including awareness programmes, separate bins and fines. The examples of recycling bottles, paper and animal waste help show why household recycling is useful, and the fine example gives a relevant reason for legal rules. However, the discussion focuses more on ways to encourage recycling than on how necessary laws are compared with other approaches. The claim that people in developing countries lack knowledge is relevant but broad, and the benefits of recycling are asserted rather than explained in detail. To strengthen the response, weigh whether education and convenient facilities could work without penalties, then explain why legislation is still needed or where it should be applied. This would develop the argument more fully and consistently address the extent question.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph describing recycling and barriers, a paragraph proposing government measures, and a conclusion. Ideas generally progress from the problem to possible solutions, and linking expressions such as “Moreover,” “For example,” and “In conclusion” help guide the reader. Some connections are nevertheless mechanical, and the first body paragraph combines examples of recyclable materials with a point about public awareness without clearly showing how one leads to the other. The conclusion repeats the recommendation rather than drawing together the argument about the role of laws. Use clearer topic sentences and make the relationship between each example and your position explicit. More precise referencing would also help readers follow phrases such as “it” and “they.”

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “segregating,” “fertilizers,” “awareness programs,” “strict rules and regulations,” and “charging fine.” These choices make the subject clear, and some less common terms show an attempt to express specific ideas. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “recycling procedure … is not performing enough,” “imply rules,” and “use the waste in more productive way.” There are also spelling or form issues, including “cattles” and “its the only way.” These do not prevent understanding, but they reduce precision and naturalness. Build a bank of common collocations for policy and recycling, and check whether each verb naturally fits its object; for example, governments introduce or enforce rules rather than imply them.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional example beginning “if government starts charging fine” and a relative clause in “those who throw their garbage randomly.” The overall meaning is usually understandable, but some errors in sentence construction, articles, agreement and punctuation remain. For instance, “government should make strategies” needs an article or plural subject, while “it will save cost, resources, time and energy” has an unclear singular subject and inconsistent number. The long opening list of recyclable materials also needs clearer sentence boundaries and punctuation. Practise accurate article use, subject–verb agreement and parallel structures, then proofread longer sentences by checking that each clause has a clear subject and verb. This would improve control while preserving your attempts at complex grammar.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.