Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

Now a days recycle waste has become an controversial part of people's live. There are those who think that the waste from homes is recycle is not enough however other believes that the only way to rising recycling is for goverment to take it a legal requirement. In this essay, I will examine the situation and provide my own opinions.

There are a numbers of reason why people think that recycle waste is enough from homes. The particularly argument supporting this idea is that it waste peoples time and energy. For example there are lots of people who were employee thats why they have not enough time for recycled their home waste .Secondly, It also need lots of equipments for clean their waste. As a result it also costly.

On the other hand, there are lots of arguments againt a recycle waste. The primary arguments is that goverment should take a legal action to clean their waste and also make law. As a result, People should concern about it and take their own responsibily about it. Secondly, They must follow govt rules make it as a habit.

In conclusion, I believe quite strongly believe that recycle easte is not just a eco friendly system but also save our environment. How ever I feel the best way to solve this problem in my own way. I will try clean my home and follow govt rules and also save my environment.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You address the general topic and give a personal view, especially in the conclusion, where you say recycling is environmentally beneficial and that you will follow government rules. However, the response only minimally answers the central question of how far laws are needed. The body paragraphs discuss time, equipment and costs, but do not clearly explain whether these difficulties justify making recycling compulsory or how legislation would increase recycling. The position is also inconsistent: the introduction promises to examine the issue, while the conclusion shifts to personal actions rather than a clear judgement about laws. The response is 239 words, below the required 250, and several ideas remain undeveloped. Directly state your position and support it with a specific example of a law or its likely effect.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable essay structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. Basic signposting such as “For example,” “Secondly,” and “In conclusion” helps readers identify stages of the response. However, progression between ideas is limited: the first body paragraph gives reasons people may not recycle, while the second refers to arguments “against” recycling but then argues that government should require it. This makes the relationship between the paragraphs unclear. Some linking is mechanical, and the conclusion repeats the environmental point without resolving the discussion. Organise the body around a clear contrast—barriers to voluntary recycling and the benefits or limits of legal requirements—and use references that make each point’s connection explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You use a small set of relevant topic words, including “recycle,” “waste,” “legal requirement,” “environment,” and “responsibility,” so the subject is generally identifiable. However, vocabulary is basic and repetitive, with “recycle” and “waste” appearing frequently, and several inaccurate word choices or forms make meaning less clear. For example, “recycle waste is enough from homes” does not express the intended idea clearly, while “clean their waste” is an unsuitable collocation for sorting or recycling household rubbish. Spelling errors such as “goverment,” “againt,” and “easte” also weaken clarity. Build a more precise range of topic vocabulary and check spelling and collocations when revising.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple sentences and longer structures, including a contrast introduced by “however” and a result clause beginning “As a result.” Some basic sentence meanings can be understood, but grammatical control is uneven, and errors recur in agreement, articles, verb forms and sentence construction. Examples include “There are a numbers of reason,” “other believes,” and “it also need lots of equipments.” The opening sentence also has an unclear structure, and punctuation and capitalisation are inconsistent, as in “.Secondly” and “People” after a comma. These problems sometimes make the intended relationships difficult to follow. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement and complete sentence patterns first, then add complex clauses and check each sentence for articles and verb forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.