Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-01

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

some of individual claim that home waste are recycle that are not Enough. they thik government should make it legal for everyone. it’s only one way to control this issue. this eassy will explain why it’s need to be legal way

the primary reason that government should take over this issu becuse people are not too much awareness how can home waste can disbalanced our ecosystem. to explain home waste is directly reduced soil quality. and badly effect on air pollution in addition sometime for increasing waste local water drain can be off and it can be major concern for our revers and clean water.

to addressing this issu government can play a crucial role. for intense authority should came out with strict regulations. and arrange some awareness programme in society. to explain Authority can introduced regulations that people who will not followed this rule thay might be pay fine. morover government should make sure that every family members participate in Awareness programme.who will miss this programme they should face sustainable fine

in conclusion home waste recycling process can be controlled with strict regulations and Awareness education.government and individual can mitigated this issu carefully.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You take a relevant position by arguing that government rules are needed, and you give related reasons: people may lack awareness of environmental harm, while fines and awareness programmes could encourage recycling. However, the response only partially develops the question of how necessary laws are. It does not clearly weigh laws against other ways of increasing recycling, and the examples about soil, air and water are listed rather than explained. Your conclusion says regulations and education can help, but the extent of your agreement remains vague. The response is also 56 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop your reasoning. To strengthen the answer, state your position precisely and explain one or two examples in more detail.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has an overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph giving reasons and proposed measures, and a conclusion. This makes the main line of thought reasonably easy to follow. You also use basic linking expressions such as “the primary reason,” “in addition,” and “in conclusion.” However, some connections are mechanical or unclear, particularly “to explain” repeated within the body paragraph, and the ideas move quickly from environmental effects to fines and then awareness programmes. The opening repeats the claim rather than setting up a clear progression. Organise the body into distinct points, use linking phrases that show the relationship between them, and make references such as “this issue” clearly identify the problem being discussed.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “ecosystem,” “soil quality,” “regulations,” “awareness programme,” and “fine.” These choices show an attempt to discuss environmental policy rather than relying only on very general language. However, the range is limited, and frequent spelling and word-choice errors sometimes make the meaning difficult to understand, as in “disbalanced our ecosystem,” “local water drain can be off,” and “clean water.” Some phrases are also unnatural or imprecise, such as “government should take over this issue.” Check spelling carefully and learn common collocations for recycling and environmental impacts. More precise wording would help you explain your ideas clearly and avoid repeating “issue” and “government.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, for example, “the primary reason that government should take over this issu becuse people are not too much awareness…” This shows an effort to connect ideas, but the longer structures are often difficult to follow. Errors in sentence formation, verb forms, agreement, articles and punctuation occur throughout: “home waste are recycle,” “people who will not followed this rule,” and “government and individual can mitigated” are examples. Capitalisation and sentence boundaries are also inconsistent. These problems can obscure the intended meaning, even though the reader can identify your general argument. Build accuracy first with clear subject–verb sentences, then practise joining them using “because,” “which,” and “if” while checking verb forms and agreement.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.