Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-07-30
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The take below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Underground Railway Systems
City Date opened Kilometers of route Passengers per year (in millions) London 1863 394 775 Paris 1900 199 1191 Tokyo 1927 155 1927 Washington DC 1976 126 144 Kyoto 1981 11 45 Los Angeles 2001 28 50
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The given table illustrates the number of passengers per year in the underground railway systems in six different cities, measured in million.
Overall, it can be seen that the highest number of passengers recorded in Tokyo city , while least passengers accounted in Kyoto .
To begin with , in London insital period 1863 this city covers 394 kilometers of route and total number of passengers about 775 millions. during 1900 Paris showed 199 kilometers of way passed and 1191 millions of passengers were travel in year. The number of 1927 passengers travel per year in underground railway system in Tokyo , opened 1927 and 155 route covered.
Turning to remining data , Washin gton DC 126 route in 1976 and 144 passengers accounted per year . In Kyoto and Los Angeles cities total 45 million and 50 millions passengers per year , respectively . 1981 kyoto city 11 kilometers of route and 2001 Los Angeles 28 route
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5
The response covers all the required data points, including the dates, route lengths, and passenger numbers for all six cities. You have successfully identified the main features, such as the highest and lowest passenger figures. However, the report lacks a clear, analytical comparison. For instance, while you mention the data for each city, you do not explicitly contrast the older systems (like London) with the newer ones (like Los Angeles) in terms of efficiency or scale. To improve, ensure you group the data logically rather than listing each city individually, and focus more on the trends and significant differences between the cities.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the flow between sentences is often mechanical and sometimes disjointed. For example, the transition 'Turning to remining data' is a bit abrupt, and the final sentence is incomplete, which disrupts the logical progression of the text. The use of cohesive devices is limited and occasionally inaccurate. To reach a higher band, focus on using a wider variety of linking words (e.g., 'in contrast', 'conversely', 'furthermore') to connect your ideas more fluidly and ensure that each paragraph has a clear, unified focus.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
Your vocabulary is generally adequate to convey the information, but it lacks the precision and variety expected at higher levels. There are several instances of awkward phrasing, such as '199 kilometers of way passed' and '1191 millions of passengers were travel in year'. These errors occasionally make the text difficult to follow. You rely heavily on basic descriptors and struggle with accurate collocations related to data reporting. To improve, try to incorporate more sophisticated vocabulary related to statistics and trends, and pay closer attention to word forms and standard collocations used in academic writing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The response contains a mix of simple and some attempted complex structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout. Issues include incorrect verb tenses ('were travel'), missing articles ('in London insital period'), and fragmented sentences, particularly in the final paragraph. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with unnecessary spaces before commas. While the meaning is generally clear, these errors are frequent enough to distract the reader. To improve, focus on subject-verb agreement, consistent use of articles, and ensuring that every sentence has a clear subject and verb. Proofreading for basic sentence structure would significantly enhance your score.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.