Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The take below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Underground Railway Systems

City	Date opened	Kilometers of route	Passengers per year (in millions)
London	1863	394	775
Paris	1900	199	1191
Tokyo	1927	155	1927
Washington DC	1976	126	144
Kyoto	1981	11	45
Los Angeles	2001	28	50

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The table beneath shows the details of six different urban towns about the systems of their unerground railways.

Overall , we can see that London city has the oldest railyway station opened in 1863, while also covering the largest route of 394 kilometers. Additionaly, the tokyo city has the most significant quantity of passengers of 1927 per each year.

To begin with, london, paris and tokyo established in 1863, 1900 and 1927 respectively has the vastest routes with 394 , 199 and 155 kilometers in the same order. Furthermore, the tokyo city has the most extensive quantity of passengers with 1927 per each other while paris has second largest with 1191 and london with 775 passengers per year.

Moreover, among the cities washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles , the first one is the oldest opened in 1976 while the second one in 1981 and the last one in 2001 correspondingly. Among these Kyoto has the lowest number of passengers with 45 numbers per year and also the shortest route with just 11 kilometers. Lost Angeles contains numbers of 50 and 28 while Washington Dc holds 144 and 126 in the same order.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main contrasts: London is the oldest system and has the longest route, while Tokyo carries the most passengers; Kyoto has the shortest route and lowest passenger figure. You also report figures for all six cities, so the response addresses the task. However, some comparisons are less fully or clearly presented. For example, the opening overview does not mention that Tokyo’s passenger total is far higher than the others, and the final paragraph gives the figures for Los Angeles and Washington in an unclear order. The statement that London, Paris and Tokyo have the “vastest routes” is broadly relevant, but a clearer comparison with the smaller systems would make the key features more complete and precise.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and two paragraphs grouping the older, larger systems and the newer, smaller ones. This gives the information an overall logical arrangement. Linking expressions such as “To begin with,” “Furthermore,” and “Moreover” help signal progression, although their use is somewhat mechanical. Some references and comparisons are difficult to follow: “the first one,” “the second one,” and “the last one” require the reader to work out which city is meant, while “in the same order” does not make the figures’ sequence fully clear. Use city names more often and organise each comparison consistently by date, route length, or passenger numbers.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of vocabulary for describing the table, including “oldest,” “largest route,” “established,” and “shortest route.” Some attempts at more formal or varied wording are not natural or precise, however. “Urban towns” is not an appropriate description of the cities, and “most significant quantity of passengers” is less idiomatic than “highest annual passenger total.” There are also spelling errors, including “unerground,” “Additionaly,” and “Lost Angeles,” and inconsistent capitalisation of city names. These do not prevent the reader from understanding the main comparisons, but they reduce accuracy and polish. Prefer straightforward, standard collocations for data reporting and check spelling and proper nouns carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including clauses linked with “while” and “among,” and the main information is generally understandable. Some grammatical errors remain. For example, “london, paris and tokyo established in 1863, 1900 and 1927 respectively has” has a subject–verb agreement problem and an incomplete construction; “the Tokyo city has” also uses an unnecessary article. In “with 1927 per each other,” the comparison pattern is not grammatically formed. Punctuation spacing is inconsistent, and the overview has an awkward comma after “Overall.” Aim to make each sentence’s subject and verb clear, and check agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries when combining comparisons.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.