Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-12
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some say that the most important thing about being rich is that one has the opportunity to help others. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Student answer (Band 5.5)
It is common for most of the people to think that being rich means having the chance to contribute on charity. Generally, yes I do agree with that way of thinking; because from my perspective there is nothing important than hepling the poor people. A good example would be, the rich people can afford accomodations for those who can not afford a bed to sleep on and a roof upon them. In other words, from people's point of view rich people should help others while they can, so is this the only important thing that wealthy individuals should do ?.
Firstly, the way people assuming that the most crucial part of being rich is the capability to help those who is need support; this idea came out of their humanity and their eager to lend a hand to poor residents, for instance, the critiria of people dying of hunger is increasingly terrifying, the amount of poor ones who suffered living without a proper meals is terribly sad story. I do agree with the majority of people's perspective, but that does not mean its the only critical thing the wealthy individuals should do.
Secondly, is it really the only important thing of being rich is just to help the others?, while one of the major things that individuals can use their fortune to fix it and make the world a better place is to help the country; For example, they can help through inventing a useful corporations that provide a multiple ways to sustain the country such as constructing companies and paid cleaning programs, I do think this more critical because it will eventually be beneficial to all kind of people.
In conclusion, the idea of helping others through providing food and accomodation to them is pure heart idea, but helping the country means helping all the people in direct or indirect ways such as fixing the roads and cleaning the streets. I personally agree with both of ideas but I think helping the country would be more crucial.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You give a clear general position: you agree that helping others matters, while arguing that using wealth to improve the country is also important. The examples of providing accommodation and supporting companies or cleaning programmes are relevant to the topic. However, the response only partly develops the central question of whether helping others is the most important benefit of being rich. The second body paragraph shifts towards helping the country without clearly explaining how this compares with helping individuals or why it should be considered more important. The opening also raises a question that is not directly answered. To strengthen the response, state your degree of agreement precisely and develop each example to show how it supports that position.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs signalled by “Firstly” and “Secondly,” and a conclusion. This helps the reader follow the broad direction of your argument. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear, and linking phrases can feel mechanical or lead into incomplete reasoning. For example, “In other words” repeats the point about wealthy people helping, while the question “so is this the only important thing” is not smoothly connected to the preceding sentence. The second body paragraph also moves from helping others to helping the country without a clear comparison. Use topic sentences that state each paragraph’s main claim, then connect examples explicitly to that claim and to your overall position.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “wealthy individuals,” “capability,” “sustain,” and “beneficial,” and the reader can generally understand your intended ideas. However, the range is limited by repeated words such as “help,” “people,” and “important,” and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or awkward. Examples include “contribute on charity,” “the critiria of people dying of hunger,” and “a useful corporations.” Spelling errors such as “hepling,” “accomodations,” and “critiria” also reduce accuracy. Build a more precise set of expressions for charitable support and public investment, and check whether nouns and verbs naturally combine before using less familiar vocabulary.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “while” and “because,” and your main ideas are usually understandable. However, complex structures are often faulty, and errors in agreement, articles, sentence boundaries, and punctuation sometimes make the reader work to interpret the meaning. For example, “the way people assuming” lacks a correctly formed verb, and “those who is need support” has an agreement and clause-structure problem. The sentence beginning “Secondly, is it really…” is also awkwardly formed, while the opening uses a semicolon before “because” inappropriately. Practise building accurate sentences around one main clause, then add subordinate clauses only when their grammatical relationship is clear.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.