Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The bar chart illustrates the results of a survey about people coffee and tea purchasing and drinking in different five Australian cities.

Overall, it is evident that people went to a cafe for coffee or tea in last 4 weeks was highest category. whereas bought fresh coffee in last 4 weeks was seen lowest in the Australian different cities.

To begin, in the Australian people went to a cafe for coffee or tea in last 4 weeks was Sydney above 60%, Melbourne azround 64%, stood at Brisbane 56%, Adelaide 49% and Harbat 63% approximatelly, while people bought instant coffee in last 4 weeks in australia firstly city Sydney 46% approximately, Melbourne under 50%, Brisbane stood at 53% also Adelaide 50% after that in Hobart percentage was seen highest 54%.

In contrast, bought fresh coffee in the last 4 weeks in australian different cites. highest one Sydney around 44%, second highest Melbourne 43%, third highest city was Harbart consumed 38%, in addition second lowest city was A delaide. further more, lowest city name was Brisbane.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main overall pattern: café visits are generally the most popular activity, while fresh-coffee purchases are usually the least popular. You also report many figures accurately, including café visits in Melbourne and Hobart and instant-coffee purchases in Brisbane and Hobart. This addresses the task with relevant comparisons. However, the overview is too broad: fresh coffee is not the lowest category in every city, since instant coffee is lower in Sydney and Melbourne. Some details are also incomplete; for example, Adelaide’s fresh-coffee figure is omitted, and the comparison of fresh-coffee results does not give Brisbane’s approximate value. Make the overview more precise and ensure each key comparison is clearly supported by the chart.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, moving from an introduction and overview to café visits, instant coffee, and fresh coffee. This gives the reader a general route through the information. However, progression within the body is sometimes awkward: the café figures are introduced with “To begin,” but the sentence structure makes the city-by-city comparison difficult to follow. “In contrast” does not clearly signal the relationship between the final paragraph and the preceding data, and “further more” adds a link without improving the logic. Use separate, clearly organised sentences for each category, and connect comparisons consistently. Clearer referencing and more purposeful linking would make the overall arrangement easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant chart vocabulary, including “percentage,” “highest,” “lowest,” and “approximately,” and the reader can generally understand which activities and cities you mean. However, the range is limited by repeated wording such as “in last 4 weeks,” “city,” and “stood at.” Several choices are inaccurate or unnatural, including “people coffee and tea purchasing,” “Australian different cities,” and “consumed” for buying coffee. Spelling errors such as “azround,” “approximatelly,” and “Harbart” also reduce precision. Aim for concise, natural reporting language and check spelling and city names. For example, use “residents who bought” rather than “people … purchasing,” and “the figure was” instead of repeatedly using “stood at.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a contrast introduced by “while,” and the main meaning is usually recoverable. However, some sentence patterns are incomplete or difficult to control. For example, “people went to a cafe … was Sydney above 60%” lacks a clear grammatical structure, while “whereas bought fresh coffee … was seen lowest” has no clear subject. There are also recurring issues with articles, agreement, and prepositions, as in “in last 4 weeks” and “in the Australian people.” Use a consistent pattern such as “In Sydney, about 61% of residents went to a café.” Shorter, complete sentences would improve accuracy while still allowing you to vary structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.