Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-07-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The given column graph illustrats the percentage of people who had the habit of buy and drink coffee or tea in five Australian cities.

It can be seen that, the sydney had the highest number of people who bought fresh coffee in last 4 weeks and the percentage was more than 42 percent.On the other hand, Melbourne and hobart stayed second and third place with the number of 41 percent and 37 percent respectively. Brisbane and adelaide had the lowest number of residents who brought fresh coffee and it's nearly 34 percent in both cities.

On the other side, melbourne climbed top with the residents who went to a cafe for coffee or tea and the number was 64 percent. Hobart also lead top positon by the percentage of people who brought instant coffee with the number of 54 percent residents. the remaining three cities like sydney, brisbane and adelaide

also contributed with the large number of residents respectively.

Overall, every cities people had the diversity with their choice, so some cities residents mostly like fresh coffee or instant coffee, on the other side some cities people choose to went cafe for coffee or tea in last 4 weeks.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response covers the main features of the data, including the highest and lowest points for the three categories. However, the analysis is somewhat superficial. For example, the description of the 'remaining three cities' is vague and lacks specific data points, which is necessary for a higher band. The overview is present but could be more analytical by highlighting the most significant trends rather than just stating that there is diversity. To improve, ensure all key data points mentioned are accurate and that comparisons are more explicit across all five cities.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the information. However, the use of cohesive devices is somewhat mechanical and occasionally inaccurate, such as 'On the other side' used to introduce a new category. The referencing is sometimes unclear, particularly in the final paragraph where the connection between the cities and their preferences is a bit muddled. Improving the variety of linking words and ensuring that each paragraph has a clear, unified focus would enhance the flow of the response.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but there are several instances of word-choice errors and awkward phrasing, such as 'climbed top' instead of 'topped the list' or 'brought' instead of 'bought'. The range is limited, and the repetition of 'number' and 'percentage' suggests a need for more varied synonyms. While the meaning is clear, the lack of precision in collocation prevents the response from reaching a higher band. Focusing on topic-specific vocabulary related to data trends would be beneficial.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The response contains a mix of simple and some complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors. Issues include subject-verb agreement ('every cities people'), missing articles ('the sydney'), and incorrect verb forms ('choose to went cafe'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with several run-on sentences and missing spaces after periods. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to distract the reader and indicate a lack of control over complex structures.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.