Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 7.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-08-02
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 7.5)
When surveying people of major cities in Australia, regarding their coffee and tea drinking habits, the survey revealed that most city residents had visited a cafe for coffee or tea in the last month. Hobart and Melbourne had more than 60% of their residents visit a coffee shop while Adelaide had less than 50% do so.
Additionally, comparing fresh coffee and instant coffee purchases showed that all residents across Australia favored the instant coffee option. Sydney's percentages were closely related but Brisbane's gap between instant and fresh coffee was staggering; more than 15% gap. Sydney, along with Melbourne, had the most fresh coffee drinkers across Australia while Brisbane and Adelaide had the least.
It is important to note that Adelaide had more instant coffee drinkers than residents who visited coffee shops. This is unlike the other four cities where coffee shop customers outnumbered the instant coffee drinkers by adequate margins.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 7.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 7.5 |
| Overall | 7.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0
The response covers the main features of the data, including the cafe visits and the comparison between fresh and instant coffee. You have successfully identified key trends, such as the preference for instant coffee across all cities and the specific outlier status of Adelaide. However, the report lacks a clear overview or summary statement that synthesizes the data at the beginning or end. While you mention specific percentages, adding a more comprehensive comparison of the cities' overall rankings would improve the analytical depth. The information is accurate, but ensure that all data points are clearly linked to the specific categories provided in the chart to avoid ambiguity.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5
The response is logically organized into three distinct paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the progression of ideas. You use some cohesive devices effectively, such as 'Additionally' and 'It is important to note'. However, the transition between the first and second paragraphs is slightly abrupt. The use of referencing is generally clear, though some sentences could be better linked to improve the flow. The paragraphing is appropriate for a report of this length, and the ideas are sequenced in a way that makes the information easy to digest.
Lexical Resource — Band 7.0
You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'residents', 'favored', and 'outnumbered' appropriately. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as 'staggering' and 'adequate margins', which adds variety. However, some word choices could be more precise; for example, 'closely related' is a bit vague when describing statistical data. The vocabulary is sufficient to convey the intended meaning clearly, but further development of topic-specific collocations related to data reporting would help elevate the score.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.5
The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, which is appropriate for this task. Most sentences are grammatically accurate, and punctuation is generally handled well. There are minor issues, such as the phrasing 'more than 15% gap', which would be better expressed as 'a gap of more than 15%'. Additionally, some sentences could benefit from more varied structures to enhance the sophistication of the writing. Overall, the errors present are infrequent and do not impede communication, showing a good level of control.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
