Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-08-12

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The graph chart illustrates the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buyingand drinking habits in five australian cities.

Overall, it is clear that people went more often to a cafe for coffee or tea in last few week’s in Melbourne and hobart.

Melbourne recorded the highest proportion of café visitors, at about 64%, followed closely by Hobart and Sydney, at approximately 63% and 61% respectively. Brisbane had a lower figure of around 56%, while Adelaide had the lowest, at about 50%. Instant coffee purchases were highest in Hobart, at roughly 55%, followed by Brisbane at 53%. The figures for Adelaide and Melbourne were around 50% and 48%, while Sydney had the lowest proportion, at about 46%.

Fresh coffee purchases were comparatively less popular, ranging from approximately 34% in Brisbane to 44% in Sydney. Melbourne, Adelaide and Hobart recorded around 43%, 35% and 39% respectively.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response covers all three categories (café visits, instant coffee, and fresh coffee) across the five cities. However, the response is 147 words, falling short of the 150-word minimum requirement. This impacts the task achievement score as the analysis is slightly truncated. While the main features are identified and comparisons are made, the overview is somewhat simplistic. To reach a higher band, ensure you meet the word count and provide a more comprehensive summary that synthesizes the data rather than just listing figures. The inclusion of specific data points is accurate, but the overall development of the response is limited by its brevity.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The response is logically organized, with a clear introduction, an overview, and body paragraphs dedicated to specific categories. The progression of ideas is easy to follow. Cohesive devices such as 'while', 'followed by', and 'respectively' are used effectively to link information. However, the paragraphing is slightly uneven, and the transition between the overview and the body paragraphs could be smoother. The use of referencing is generally clear, though the overall structure is quite mechanical. To improve, ensure that the connection between the different categories is more explicitly stated to enhance the flow of the report.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, allowing for clear communication of the data. You successfully use terms like 'proportion', 'recorded', and 'comparatively'. However, the range is somewhat limited and repetitive. There are minor errors, such as 'graph chart' (redundant) and 'australian' (needs capitalization). To achieve a higher band, you should incorporate a wider range of vocabulary to describe trends and comparisons, such as 'predominant', 'marginal', or 'fluctuated', rather than relying heavily on 'highest' and 'lowest'. The current range is sufficient for a 6.0 but lacks the flexibility required for higher bands.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are some grammatical errors, such as 'in last few week’s' (incorrect pluralization and missing article) and 'buyingand' (missing space). While these errors do not impede communication, they are noticeable. The control of punctuation is generally acceptable, but the minor errors in word formation and articles prevent a higher score. To improve, focus on proofreading for small mechanical errors and attempt to vary sentence structures further by using more complex subordinate clauses to describe the data comparisons.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.