Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-08-20
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The bar graph illustrates the habits of buying and consuming coffee and tea by people of five different Australian cities.
Overall, the cities are Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart. In Melbourne, Sydney and Hobart the percentage of drinking coffee and tea in a cafe is higher than instant and fresh coffee from all five cities. Whereas the ration of fresh coffee is lesser.
Firstly the Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart has the greater proportion of drinking coffee and tea in the cafe whereas the purchasing of instant coffee is on second position additionally sees a decline in purchasing of fresh coffee in these cities comparing to instant coffee and dine-in in a cafe.
However, the Brisbane and Adelaide has equal level of fresh coffee purchasing moreover the instant coffee purchasing of the Brisbane is little more than the Adelaide. While the consumption of coffee and tea in a cafe the Brisbane is leading than Adelaide.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The student provides a clear overview of the survey results, mentioning the five cities and their coffee and tea consumption habits. However, the response lacks specific data to support the claims, such as exact percentages. The discussion of coffee and tea consumption compares cities but is vague and not fully developed. It would benefit from more quantitative data and clearer comparisons to fully meet the task requirements. Overall, while the ideas are present, more detail and clarity are needed for a higher score.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
The structure of the response is basic, with an introduction, an overview, and detailed comparisons. However, the comparison points are not always clear, especially in phrases like 'additionally sees a decline in purchasing,' which can confuse readers. Some sentences are lengthy and convoluted, affecting coherence. More effective use of linking words and phrases would enhance the logical flow between sentences. Overall, coherence could be improved by clearer organization and transitions between ideas.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is generally adequate but lacks precision in some areas. Words like 'higher' and 'lesser' are rather basic for an academic context and could be replaced with more appropriate terms. The use of 'little more' is vague and should be expressed in terms of specific quantities. There are some instances of repetition (e.g., 'purchasing of fresh coffee'), which can be improved by varying the language. More sophisticated vocabulary would enhance the academic nature of the response.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 4.0
Grammatical accuracy is a concern, with several errors present, including subject-verb agreement issues ('the Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart has...') and awkward phrasing ('the purchasing of instant coffee is on second position'). There are also run-on sentences that make comprehension difficult. While attempts at complex structures are present, they often result in grammatical errors, affecting clarity. The use of punctuation also needs attention to improve sentence separation and readability.
Overall feedback
The student's response demonstrates an understanding of the task, discussing coffee and tea consumption habits across several Australian cities. However, improvements are needed in several areas. To enhance Task Achievement, specific data points should be incorporated to support claims. In terms of Coherence and Cohesion, clearer connections and structured organization are necessary for better flow. For Lexical Resource, it would be beneficial to expand vocabulary use to sound more academic. Lastly, grammatical accuracy requires serious attention to reduce errors and improve clarity. Overall, with focused revisions, the response has the potential to reach a higher band score.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.