Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-09-02

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 7.5)

The bar chart illustrates the results of a survey on the coffee and tea buying and drinking habits of people in five Australian cities: Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart.

Overall, visiting a café for coffee or tea was the most popular activity in most cities. Melbourne recorded the highest percentage of people who went to a café, while Brisbane had the lowest figure for buying fresh coffee. Buying instant coffee was also relatively common in all five cities.

In Sydney, approximately 44% of residents bought fresh coffee, while around 46% purchased instant coffee. However, the proportion who went to a café was much higher, at about 61%. Melbourne showed a similar pattern, with roughly 42% buying fresh coffee and 48% buying instant coffee. The figure for visiting a café was the highest, at approximately 63%.

In Brisbane, only about 34% of people bought fresh coffee, compared with 52% who purchased instant coffee. Around 55% went to a café. In Adelaide, approximately 34% bought fresh coffee and 49% bought instant coffee, while 48% visited a café. Finally, Hobart had about 38% buying fresh coffee, 53% buying instant coffee and 62% going to a café.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5

The response effectively addresses all parts of the task. You have successfully identified the main features, such as the popularity of café visits across all cities and the specific trends for fresh versus instant coffee. The overview is clear and provides a good summary of the data. You have made relevant comparisons between the cities, such as noting that Melbourne had the highest café attendance and Brisbane the lowest fresh coffee consumption. The data is accurately reported, and the information is well-selected to provide a concise yet comprehensive summary of the provided chart.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5

The response is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. You have used paragraphing effectively to separate the overview from the detailed body paragraphs. Cohesive devices such as 'while', 'however', 'compared with', and 'finally' are used appropriately to link sentences and ideas. The flow of information is smooth, and the referencing is clear throughout the text. The structure is logical, moving from a general summary to specific city-by-city comparisons, which makes the information easy to follow for the reader.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

You have used a sufficient range of vocabulary to describe the data accurately. Terms like 'proportion', 'recorded', 'illustrates', and 'consumption' (implied by context) are used correctly. While the vocabulary is functional and accurate, it is somewhat standard. To reach a higher band, you could incorporate more sophisticated collocations or varied synonyms for 'buying' and 'going to a café' to demonstrate a wider, more flexible range of lexical items. However, the current usage is precise and there are no errors that impede communication.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.5

The response demonstrates a good control of grammatical structures. You have used a mix of simple and complex sentences effectively, such as 'Melbourne showed a similar pattern, with roughly 42% buying fresh coffee and 48% buying instant coffee.' Punctuation is accurate, and there are very few grammatical errors. The sentence structures are varied and contribute to the clarity of the report. The majority of your sentences are error-free, showing a strong command of English grammar suitable for this task.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.