Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-09-08

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The bar chart below illustrates us the outcome of a survey about individuals coffee and tea and drinking habits in five Australian cities

In this bar graph the Sydney and Melbourne have same number in which fresh coffee is bought and Brisbane and Adelaide have also the same number but there is a little increase in Hobart. While for the instant coffee Brisbane and Adelaide have same number and Sydney and Melbourne are quietly same and Hobart has slight increase.

This bar chart illustrates that the individuals that bought fresh coffee is 44 percent in Sydney and Melbourne and in Brisbane and Adelaide have 34 percent and Hobart is on 38 percent. And for the instant coffee Sydney and Melbourne have percentages like 45 and 54 while for Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart it is 53 50 and 54. And for going to the coffee shop the Sydney and Melbourne has percentages like 60 to 64 and for the Brisbane and Adelaide it is 55 and 44. In the end the percentage for the Hobart is 63.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response addresses the task by identifying some main features, but it fails to provide a clear overview or a logical summary of the data. While you mention specific percentages, the presentation is fragmented and lacks a cohesive comparison between the cities. The report relies heavily on listing figures rather than synthesizing the information. To improve, you should group the data more effectively—for instance, by comparing the popularity of fresh coffee versus instant coffee across all cities—and ensure that the most significant trends are highlighted in an introductory overview.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the progression of ideas is weak. The transition between sentences is often mechanical, and the use of cohesive devices is limited. For example, the repetitive use of 'and' to connect clauses makes the text feel like a list rather than a coherent report. The referencing is sometimes unclear, such as when you list percentages without explicitly linking them to the specific categories or cities in a way that is easy for the reader to follow. Improving the use of linking words like 'whereas', 'in contrast', and 'similarly' would enhance the flow.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is quite basic and repetitive. You frequently use the phrase 'have same number' or 'have percentages like', which limits the sophistication of your writing. There is little attempt to use a range of vocabulary to describe trends, such as 'fluctuated', 'remained stable', or 'accounted for'. The word choice is functional but lacks the precision required for higher bands. To improve, focus on using synonyms and more descriptive verbs and nouns related to data analysis, such as 'proportion', 'figure', 'surpassed', or 'minimal variation'.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text, including issues with subject-verb agreement ('Sydney and Melbourne has') and missing articles ('the Sydney and Melbourne'). The sentence structures are predominantly simple, and there is a lack of complex sentence forms. Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly regarding the listing of data points. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar structures prevents the response from reaching a higher band. Focus on proofreading for subject-verb agreement and using a wider variety of complex sentence structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.