Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-09-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The bar graph illustrates the information about the outcomes of a research about the public's coffee and tea purchasing and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

At the fleeting glance, the residents of Melbourne were more likely to visit the cafe for coffee or tea in past 4 weeks, almost 65%. Moreover, approximately 62% of public in Hobart visit cafe for coffee or tea in last 4 weeks. However, the lowest figure of graph is people of Brisbane, only 35% of individuals bought fresh coffee in last 4 weeks.

Moving ahead, in Adelaide, the percentage of those who bought instant coffee in last 4 weeks and individuals who went to a cafe for coffee or tea in last 4 weeks was same approximately 50%. Followed by, near about 46% of residents of Sydney bought instant coffee in last 4 weeks and about 62% of individuals visit cafe, which makes the difference of almost 18%.

Overall, residents of every city more likely to visit the cafe rather than buying fresh coffee, that's why the proportion of fresh was low.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response covers several key features from the chart across the five Australian cities, such as noting Melbourne and Hobart's high cafe visitation rates and Brisbane's low fresh coffee purchases. However, the selection of data is somewhat disjointed and lacks a fully comprehensive overview. While some comparisons are attempted, the overall reporting is a bit fragmented, and specific data points (such as Adelaide and Sydney) are described in isolation without a cohesive comparative structure. This places the response comfortably in Band 6, as it addresses the task and highlights relevant features, but some details are under-developed or lack complete comparative analysis across all categories.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The response is organized into four paragraphs, providing a logical overall structure from introduction to body paragraphs and a concluding summary. Cohesive devices are used to signal progression, such as 'At the fleeting glance', 'Moreover', 'However', and 'Moving ahead'. However, some cohesive phrasing is awkward or unnatural (e.g., 'At the fleeting glance' instead of 'At a glance', and 'Followed by' starting a new sentence without a subject). Paragraphing is present and appropriate for a Task 1 response, but referencing and transitions can occasionally feel mechanical, leading to a Band 6 score.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, with domain-specific terms like 'purchasing', 'proportion', 'residents', and 'fresh coffee'. There are several lexical and collocational errors throughout the text, such as 'outcomes of a research' (instead of 'results of research'), 'public of Hobart visit cafe' (instead of 'the public in Hobart visited cafes'), and 'percentage of those who bought... and individuals who went... was same approximately'. While the student attempts less common vocabulary, inaccuracies in word choice and phrasing restrict the score to a Band 5.5.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The response features a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, such as relative clauses ('percentage of those who bought...'). However, there are numerous grammatical errors throughout the text, including missing articles ('in past 4 weeks'), tense inconsistencies ('visit cafe' instead of 'visited cafes' for past data), and awkward punctuation or run-on phrasing ('residents of every city more likely to visit... that's why the proportion...'). These frequent minor errors and awkward structures cause some difficulty for the reader and prevent the grammar score from reaching Band 6, supporting a 5.5.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.