Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-09-25

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The bar chart presents findings from a survey concerning the coffee and tea consumption and purchasing behaviors of individuals across five Australian cities.

The data reveals distinct trends in beverage preferences, highlighting a prevalent inclination towards instant coffee and café visits, particularly in Melbourne and Hobart.

In Melbourne and Hobart, instant coffee purchasing dominates, with approximately 60% of respondents opting for this choice. Conversely, fresh coffee remains the least favored choice across all cities, with percentages ranging from about 25% in Adelaide to nearly 45% in Sydney. This underscores a significant preference for convenience over freshness, as demonstrated by the substantial percentages of individuals purchasing instant coffee in these prominent cities.

With regards to café visits, Sydney and Brisbane emerge as the cities with the highest frequencies, where around 50% and 55% of respondents, respectively, patronize cafés for their coffee and tea needs. These figures starkly contrast with Adelaide, which shows a lower percentage of café-goers, approximately 40%. This trend reveals a consistent pattern amongst the majority of the cities, indicating that while fresh coffee consumption remains low, visiting cafés for beverages is increasingly commonplace.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The student attempts to summarise the main features of the chart, but there are several noticeable inaccuracies in reading the data. For instance, the student states that in Melbourne and Hobart, instant coffee purchasing is 'approximately 60%', whereas the chart shows Hobart at around 54.5% and Melbourne at 48.5%. Furthermore, the student claims that café visits in Sydney and Brisbane are 'around 50% and 55%', while the chart indicates Sydney is at 61%. Despite an acceptable overview in the second paragraph, these data misreadings prevent the response from fully and accurately covering all parts of the task, leading to a Band 5.5 score.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response is organized into clear paragraphs, each with a distinct focus, starting with an introduction and overview, followed by body paragraphs discussing specific beverage habits and café visits. Cohesive devices such as 'Conversely' and 'With regards to' are used to link ideas, although some logical progression is hindered by the inaccuracies in the underlying data. Paragraphing is used appropriately, and referencing is generally clear throughout the text, earning a solid Band 6.5 for Coherence and Cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary suitable for the task, successfully using terms like 'consumption', 'purchasing behaviors', 'prevalent inclination', and 'convenience'. There are some attempts at less common lexical items, although occasional inaccuracies occur in word choice or collocation. However, the vocabulary is sufficient to convey the intended meaning without impeding communication, supporting a Band 6.0 rating.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

The writing features a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, with good subordinate clause integration, such as 'while fresh coffee consumption remains low, visiting cafés for beverages is increasingly commonplace.' There are some minor grammatical slips and awkward phrasings, but the majority of sentences are grammatically sound, and punctuation is well controlled. Errors do not impede communication, meriting a Band 6.5.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.