Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-02

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The bar chart illustrators outcome of a data collection about masses coffee and tea buying and drinking behaviours for five distinct cities in Australia such as Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart in a four week period.

Overall, the charts represents heavily the people's choice for consumption of coffee or tea at a cafe, throughout the four major cities it was the single most popular decision by the nationals,who choose going to cafe except for Adelaide. Followed by buying instant coffee which was the second choice for drinking decisions for nations in all of the four cities while it was the first choice for the people of Adelaide.However buyinng fresh coffee has been the least popular choice of the nationals in all five cities.

Going to the cafe for coffee or tea was the single most popular activity in all among locals in four of the major cities, with three of them having over a 60% of the population opting out for this including Sydney at approximate 62%, Melbourne at almost 64%and Brisbane at an estimated 63% while Hobart had it as approx 55% of the people votes. While on the other hand Adelaide also had an impressive estimate of 49%.

However on the other hand trends were particularluy stable for buying instant coffe for most of the nationals.It had a favourable average of almost 50% in alll major cities, with Hoart leading the charts with an impressive approximate 54%, while it surpassed cafe pupil in Adelaide standing at roughly 50%. While the third option for buying fresh coffee has a very unpopular choice subsequently. In Sydney it was the highest at approximate 44% following by Melbourne at roughly 42% while in the remaining cities was below 40% mark.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the main parts of the task by reporting data across the five cities and covering the three categories of coffee and tea habits. However, the development of ideas is uneven and contains factual inaccuracies. For example, the student claims that Hobart had cafe attendance at approximately 55 percent when the chart shows it at 63 percent, and mixes up data regarding which city led various categories. While an overview is attempted, it lacks precision. To move toward a higher band, the response needs to select and report key features accurately without misinterpreting the visual data, ensuring that comparisons between cities are reliably grounded in the provided chart.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The text demonstrates a coherent overall arrangement with clear paragraphing separating the introduction, overview, and body details. However, progression is sometimes hindered by mechanical and repetitive cohesive devices, such as the frequent repetition of transition phrases like 'however on the other hand'. Referencing can also be unclear, making the logical flow feel disjointed in places. To achieve a higher level of cohesion, the writer should use a wider variety of linking words naturally and ensure that sentences connect smoothly without relying on repetitive transitional formulas.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is minimally adequate for the task, with attempts at less common items such as 'behaviours', 'consumption', and 'favourable average'. However, there are noticeable lexical errors, awkward word choices, and spelling mistakes throughout the text, such as 'illustrators' instead of 'illustrates', 'buyinng', 'coffe', 'Hoart', and 'pupil' instead of 'people'. These errors reflect an inconsistent control of word forms and spelling. To reach a higher standard, the student must expand their vocabulary range and improve accuracy in word choice, spelling, and collocations to ensure precise communication.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response employs a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but attempts at complex structures are frequently marred by grammatical errors. Issues include subject-verb agreement problems, awkward relative clauses such as 'nationals,who choose going to cafe', missing articles, and punctuation mistakes. Frequent errors in prepositions and clause structures require the reader to occasionally expend extra effort. To improve, the writer needs to increase grammatical accuracy, pay closer attention to basic sentence architecture, and refine punctuation to produce cleaner, error-free complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.