Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The bar chart illustrates how percentage of city residents evolved their coffee and tea buying as well as drinking habits in five different cities -Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart- of Australia in last four weeks. Overall, data reveals that proportion for city residents who went to a cafe for coffee or tea has been highest, followed by percentage of people who bought instant coffee, whereas trend for buying fresh coffee remained the lowest.

Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Hobart considerably saw a similar pattren, where more ratio of people were habitual of visiting cafes to buy coffee or tea, with values of 62%, 64%,56% and 63% respectively. However, little less number of citizens prefered to buy instant coffee, falling at values of 46%,48%,53% and 54% respectively. Trend for buying fresh was not much popular in all of the 5 cities.

Conversely, Adelaide experienced opposite trend where buying instant coffee slight matched the value of going to a cafe for coffee or tea.

This trend underscores a pronounced transition of citizens habits toward going to a cafe for coffee or tea whereas least number of people prefered buying fresh coffee in last 4 weeks.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main overall pattern: café visits are generally the most common activity, while fresh-coffee purchases are usually the least common. The city comparisons are also relevant, and the figures you give for Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Hobart are broadly consistent with the chart. However, the overview is too absolute: in Adelaide, instant coffee (about 50%) is slightly higher than café visits (about 49.5%), so café-going is not highest in every city. The response also gives little detail about fresh-coffee figures beyond saying they are unpopular, and the Adelaide comparison is only briefly stated. To strengthen the report, include a few key fresh-coffee values and explain the Adelaide exception more precisely.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, moving from an introduction and overview to city comparisons and a concluding statement. Grouping Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Hobart together is a sensible way to organise the data, and “Conversely” signals the Adelaide exception. However, the progression is weakened by repetition: the final sentence restates the overview rather than adding a useful comparison. Some links are also awkward or unclear, such as “where more ratio of people” and “This trend underscores a pronounced transition,” which makes the relationship between ideas harder to follow. A clearer paragraph plan—overview, grouped comparisons, then the Adelaide exception—would improve cohesion, with more direct references to the three chart categories.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportion,” “values,” “trend,” and “experienced opposite trend,” and the meaning is generally clear. There are, however, several inaccurate or unnatural choices that limit precision. “Evolved their coffee and tea buying” does not describe survey results naturally, while “more ratio of people” and “little less number of citizens” are awkward collocations. “Transition” also suggests change over time, which the chart does not show; it compares cities. Spelling slips such as “pattren” and “prefered” are noticeable. Aim for standard chart-reporting phrases such as “the proportion of residents,” “a slightly lower share,” and “the figures show,” and check spelling before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You attempt a mix of sentence forms, including a complex overview sentence and a contrast introduced by “Conversely,” and the main message remains understandable. Some grammatical errors persist, particularly with articles, verb forms and sentence construction. For example, “how percentage of city residents evolved” needs a different structure, such as “the percentages of residents who…”; “Trend for buying fresh was not much popular” is missing an article and has an awkward comparative construction; and “buying instant coffee slight matched” uses the wrong form of “slight.” The opening also needs clearer punctuation around the list of cities. Practise building accurate comparison sentences with “the proportion who bought…” and maintain consistent past-tense reporting.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.