Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The bar chart illustrates the findings of survey regarding coffee and tea purchasing and consumption habits in five Australian cities.

Overall, visiting a cafe was the most popular activity in all cities, while buying fresh coffee was the least common. THe percentage of people buying instant coffee was similar across most cities.

In Sydney, around 44% of people bought fresh coffee. In Melbourne, around 42% of people bought fresh coffee. In Brisbane and Adelaide, the percentage was 34%, which was the same in both cities. In Hobart, around 38% of people bought fresh coffee, which was higher than in Brisbane and Adelaide.

In Sydney and Melbourne, around 45% to 47% of people bought instant coffee, while Brisbane had the highest figure at 53%.In Adelaide, around 50% of people bought instant coffee, while in Hobart it was around 54%, which was the highest amoung cities. In sydney and Melbourne, around 61% to 63% of people went to a cafe for coffee or tea, while in Brisbane it was 55% and in Adelaide it was 49%. In Hobart, around 62% of people went to a cafe for coffee or tea.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main pattern that café visits were the most popular activity in every city, and you compare the three activities using relevant figures. The fresh-coffee figures are reported accurately, and the instant-coffee and café figures are generally close to the chart. However, the overview says fresh coffee was the least common in all cities, which is not true in Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart: instant coffee was higher there, and in Adelaide café visits were also slightly lower than instant purchases. The overview also describes instant-coffee levels as similar without highlighting the clearer range, from about 45% in Sydney to 55% in Hobart. A more precise overview and clearer identification of these exceptions would make the key features more fully developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, an overview and detail about the three activities. The city-by-city comparisons are generally easy to follow, and phrases such as “while” and “which was higher” help show contrasts. However, the body is largely a sequence of figures, with limited grouping of the most important comparisons. The long final paragraph moves from instant coffee to café visits without a paragraph break, and the transition between these topics is abrupt. There is also a missing space after “53%.” A clearer division of the detail into paragraphs and more deliberate grouping—for example, comparing the highest and lowest café figures—would improve progression and make cohesion less mechanical.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “findings,” “percentage,” “highest figure” and “most popular activity,” and the meaning remains clear. Some wording is repetitive, particularly the repeated phrase “people bought fresh coffee” and the frequent use of “around.” There are also word-choice and spelling slips: “consumption habits” is not quite accurate for a chart about buying and café visits, “amoung” is misspelled, and “THe” and “sydney” show inconsistent capitalisation. Use more precise reporting language and vary the verbs, such as “accounted for,” “stood at” and “visited a café.” These changes would make the description more concise and natural while retaining clear comparisons.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of straightforward statements and some more developed structures, including “which was higher than in Brisbane and Adelaide” and the contrast introduced by “while.” Most sentences are understandable, and errors do not obscure the data. Some grammatical control is still uneven: the opening says “findings of survey” rather than “findings of a survey,” and “In Sydney and Melbourne, around 45% to 47% of people bought instant coffee” uses an awkward range construction. The long final paragraph also joins several comparisons with commas and “while,” making sentence boundaries less controlled. Check articles and punctuation, and use a wider variety of sentence patterns to present comparisons more cleanly.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.