Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The bar chart illustrate the study about perecentage of residents buying fresh coffee, instant coffee and visted cafe for tea nd coffee in the perivous week, in five Australin citites

Overall, residents went to cafe has the highest proporation, in Melboran and Hobart. While the number of instant coffee brought in Brisbane and Hobart is the seconf highest and fresh cofee is least brought by the residents.

Residents visting cafe for drinking coffee and tea, among it the higher proportion is seen in Melborne and Hobart cities at 63% each. Followed by the second highest in Sydney city, at 61%. While, Adelaide has the lower percentage at 49%.

Peoples, who brought instant coffee in Hobart at 54%, continued by Brisbane at 53%. The least number of residents brought instant coffee is in Sydney at 45% compaired to Melborne and Adelaide have common number at 49%.

The individuals buying fresh coffee in Sydney has the highest number among all other cities at 43%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the three activities and make relevant comparisons, including café visits being highest in Melbourne and Hobart and fresh coffee purchases being relatively low. However, the overview is not fully accurate: café attendance peaks in Melbourne, with Hobart very close, rather than both being exactly equal, and fresh coffee is not the least popular activity in every city. Some figures are also misreported: Melbourne’s instant-coffee figure is about 49%, not 49% as stated only in the comparison with Adelaide (the chart shows about 48.5%), while the café figure for Adelaide is about 49.5%. Coverage is incomplete because fresh-coffee data are reported only for Sydney. A more precise overview and comparisons across all three activities would make the summary more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for café visits, instant coffee, and fresh coffee. This makes the main categories easy to follow. However, progression is uneven because the final paragraph gives only one fresh-coffee figure, leaving that category disconnected from the fuller comparisons above. Some linking is also awkward or mechanical, such as “Followed by the second highest” and “While, Adelaide,” and the overview’s “While” creates an incomplete contrast. Grouping cities by similar or contrasting results, and using complete transitions such as “By contrast” or “Meanwhile,” would make the relationships between figures clearer and cohesion more natural.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “proportion,” “residents,” “instant coffee,” and “highest,” so the reader can generally identify the categories being compared. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation, and spelling problems make the report less precise. Examples include “coffee brought” instead of “coffee bought,” “visited cafe for tea nd coffee,” and “the higher proportion is seen.” Repeated use of “number” is also imprecise when describing percentages. Spelling errors such as “perecentage,” “Australin,” and “Melboran” are noticeable. Use accurate chart-reporting phrases such as “the percentage of residents who bought” and check spelling carefully to improve clarity and control.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts some longer sentence forms, for example, “While the number of instant coffee brought in Brisbane and Hobart is the seconf highest,” but these constructions are often faulty. Several sentences lack a complete main clause, including “Followed by the second highest in Sydney city” and “While, Adelaide has the lower percentage.” There are also recurring problems with agreement and sentence structure, as in “The bar chart illustrate” and “The individuals buying fresh coffee in Sydney has.” Articles and plural forms are inconsistent, too. These errors sometimes make relationships between ideas difficult to follow. Build a reliable base with complete subject–verb sentences, then add subordinate clauses only when their structure is clear.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.