Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The given bar chart provides information about the data from a survey which was about individual's caffeine buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities including Sydney, Melbournce, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart, measuring the units in precentages per 4 weeks.

Overall, it can be seen that, almost in every city most of the people went to a cafe for drinks like coffee or tea while the trend showed lower in case of buying fresh coffee. However, a moderate number of city residents chose to buy instant coffee from all the five cities that it even excelled the amount of going to a cafe slightly in Adelaide.

In closer inspection, we can find that, buying coffee or tea from a cafe is the dominating habit among all 5 city residents and the amount was around 63% to 49% among the cities. Exceptionally, though it had a large difference with the other 2 ways but in Adelaide buying instant coffee beat it by 1% and became the largest share at t 50%. Meanwhile, the least amount of persons bought fresh coffee consistently in all 5 cities and the data fluctuated in between the range of 34% to 44%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

You provide a clear overview of the main pattern: café visits are generally the most popular activity, while fresh-coffee purchases are lowest, and instant coffee leads in Adelaide. These points are supported by relevant ranges, including café figures of about 49%–64% and fresh coffee at roughly 34%–44%. The Adelaide comparison is also accurate: instant coffee is just above café visits. This gives the response a well-focused account of the key features. To make the report more fully developed, include a few direct city-to-city comparisons—for example, Hobart and Melbourne have the highest café attendance, while Brisbane and Adelaide share the lowest fresh-coffee figure—and clarify that café visits are not the leading activity in Adelaide.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable report structure, moving from an introduction to an overview and then to supporting details. Phrases such as “Overall” and “In closer inspection” help signal the stages of the report, and the main comparisons are grouped sensibly. This provides a coherent overall arrangement. However, some linking is awkward or imprecise: “However” does not clearly connect the two overview points, and “Meanwhile” introduces a point that is more a continuation than a contrast. The long second paragraph also combines several comparisons without clearly separating them. For stronger progression, organise the details by activity or by city, and use connectors only when their logical relationship is clear.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “survey,” “residents,” “dominating habit,” “fluctuated,” and “share.” These choices allow you to describe the chart and make comparisons, and the meaning is generally clear. There are, however, some inaccurate or unnatural choices that limit precision: “individual’s caffeine buying” is not a natural description of the survey, “the trend showed lower” is unclear, and “amount of persons” is an unsuitable collocation. Spelling errors such as “Melbournce” and “precentages” also detract from control. Aim for standard chart language such as “proportion of residents,” “was lower,” and “percentage,” and use “coffee or tea” rather than the broader “drinks” where appropriate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of sentence forms, including a complex overview sentence beginning “Overall, it can be seen that…” and a contrast clause with “though.” The reader can follow the main message, but some grammatical errors recur and make several sentences less controlled. For example, “the trend showed lower” lacks a clear grammatical complement, while “from all the five cities that it even excelled” joins clauses incorrectly. The phrase “in between the range” also has an awkward prepositional pattern, and “at t 50%” contains a typing or punctuation error. Build accuracy by using shorter, complete comparisons—for instance, “Instant coffee purchases were highest in Hobart, at about 55%”—and check clause boundaries, articles, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.