Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The bar chart illustrates the results of the survery about people's buying and drinking habits particularly with tea and coffee.

The results are recorded utilizing the last 04 weeks of data. The survery reports three category of people; people who bought instant coffee, people who bought fresh coffee and those who visited cafe for tea or coffee. Overall, in all five countries there are more number of people who visits cafe for coffee or tea than people who bough fresh or instant coffee.

Approximately 63% of people from Melbourne visited cafe for coffee or tea in last 04 weeks which marks Melbourne on top for consumption of tea or coffee via cafe. Hobart and Sydney shares a similar proportion of people visiting cafe around 62% and around 61% respectively. The cafe culture is not as common as other 02 cities in Brisbane and Adelaide as they have around 56% and 49% respectively.

In Hobart, around 54% people consumes instant coffee while around 38% people consumes fresh coffee. Adelaide and brisbane shares same proportion around 34% of people who consumes fresh coffee, While 50% people in Adeliade and around 53% people in Brisbane utilise instant coffee. Sydney and Melbourne holds relatively smaller proportion of people consuming both fresh and instant coffee.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the three survey measures and give a clear overall comparison: café visits exceed either coffee-purchasing category in every city. You also select useful details, including Melbourne’s highest café figure, Adelaide’s lowest, and the similar fresh-coffee proportions in Brisbane and Adelaide. Most reported figures are close to the chart. To make the overview more complete, highlight the broader contrast that café visits are generally the leading activity, while instant coffee purchases exceed fresh coffee purchases in all five cities. The final claim that Sydney and Melbourne have relatively smaller proportions for both coffee types is unclear and not fully supported, since their fresh-coffee figures are among the higher ones. More precise comparisons would strengthen the report.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction, a general summary, and paragraphs giving café and coffee-purchase details. This makes the main information easy to locate. However, progression within the final paragraph is less controlled: it moves from Hobart to Adelaide and Brisbane, then to Sydney and Melbourne without giving the latter cities’ figures or explaining the comparison. Some linking is also mechanical, particularly the repeated use of “while” to contrast figures. Use a clearer grouping, such as comparing the two coffee types across all cities, and make references explicit. A more focused overview paragraph would also help the reader follow the main patterns before the details.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “proportion,” “consumption,” and “category,” and the meaning is generally clear. However, several word choices and collocations are unnatural or imprecise for describing survey data: “more number of people,” “marks Melbourne on top,” and “utilise instant coffee.” There are also spelling errors, including “survery,” “bough,” and “Adeliade,” which reduce accuracy. Prefer concise, conventional reporting language and check spelling carefully. For example, describe a city as having the highest percentage, and say residents bought instant coffee rather than “utilise” it. Greater precision in these choices would make the report sound more fluent and appropriately academic.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more developed sentence forms, and the main comparisons can usually be understood. However, some errors in agreement, articles, and sentence construction remain. For example, “three category” should be plural, “Hobart and Sydney shares” needs a plural verb, and “people who visits” should use a plural verb. The repeated pattern “people consumes” also has subject–verb disagreement. Articles are missing in phrases such as “visited cafe,” and the final sentence beginning “Sydney and Melbourne holds” has another agreement error. These mistakes do not generally prevent understanding, but they limit grammatical control. Review plural subjects and verbs, and check articles when referring to cafés.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.