Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-17

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The graph chart illustrates the data regarding a survey done on people purchasing coffee and tea with their drinking habits in five different urban side of Australia.At a glance,the percentages are demonstrating all the purchasing records stating almost at similar points except in Adelaide town.

Overall, it is clear that there is an estimation done of people buying fresh coffee,instant coffee and visited a coffee shop for coffee or tea consumption in the last 1 month.Additionally,in Sydney,Melbourne and Hobart the percentage of fresh and instant coffee buyer was less than the coffee shop visitors which consists of approximately similar numbers such as 60%,63% and 62% whereas;Brisbane has less visitors of coffee shop which is 55% and Adelaide is having the lowest number of coffee shop visitors compared to others.Furthermore,the number of instant coffee buyers in Sydney and Melbourne were almost at a similar stage which is 46% and 48% respectively.However,in other three cities the number of instant coffee buyers remained in a fluctuating state.Nevertheless,the number of fresh coffee buyers was the highest in Sydney and the lowest in Brisbane and Adelaide with a similar percentage.

In conclusion,Hobart city has the highest number of instant coffee buyers.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the three measures and give a broad overview that café visits were generally higher than coffee purchases, with Adelaide an exception. Several comparisons are relevant, including the high café figures in Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart and the low fresh-coffee figures in Brisbane and Adelaide. However, the report does not consistently select the most important features: it gives little comparison of café attendance across all five cities and does not clearly state that instant coffee was the most popular purchase in Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart. The final claim that Hobart had the highest instant-coffee figure is inaccurate; Hobart was highest, but only slightly above Brisbane, and this should be supported by a clearer comparison. Some figures are approximate, but the overall account remains limited and unevenly developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has an opening, a longer overview-and-details paragraph, and a concluding sentence, so there is some organisation. It also uses linking expressions such as “Overall,” “Additionally,” “Furthermore,” and “However.” However, the progression is not consistently clear: the overview, city comparisons and concluding claim are mixed together, and the conclusion repeats a detail rather than summarising the main pattern. Some connectors feel mechanical or do not show a clear contrast, particularly “Nevertheless” before another fresh-coffee comparison. Grouping the information by measure or by the clearest city patterns, then using more precise links between comparisons, would make the report easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of task-related terms, including “percentages,” “buyers,” “visitors,” and “fluctuating,” and the reader can generally understand the comparisons. However, several choices are unnatural or imprecise for describing a chart, such as “graph chart,” “urban side,” “purchasing records,” and “similar stage.” “Estimation done” also does not clearly describe what the figures represent, while “coffee shop visitors” is less precise than café attendance. Repetition of “number” and “percentage” limits flexibility, and some phrases make the report harder to interpret. Aim for standard data-reporting collocations and use verbs such as “accounted for,” “stood at,” or “was higher than” accurately.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt longer sentences with subordinate clauses and contrast, for example the sentence beginning “Additionally, in Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart…”. However, complex sentences are often difficult to control, and errors in agreement, articles, tense and punctuation occur throughout. Examples include “the percentage … was less” where a plural subject is intended, “the number … were,” and “there is an estimation done,” which has an awkward construction. Several sentences run together without spaces after full stops or commas, and the semicolon before “Brisbane” is not used effectively. These problems sometimes make relationships between ideas unclear. Build accuracy first with shorter comparison sentences, then combine them using controlled clauses and consistent past-tense reporting.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.