Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-17

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The bar chart compares the data of a survey about the people in five different cities of Australia who bought fresh coffee, instant coffee or went to a cafe for coffee or tea for the last 4 weeks.

Overall, going to cafe for coffee or tea is the most popular amount all five cities while buying a fresh coffee is least common.

Melbourne recorded the highest proportion of people who went to cafe for coffee or team, at 63%, followed closely by Hobart, at 62%. Sydney figure was approximately 61% while Brisbane and Adelaide stood at 56% and 49% respectively.

Hobart accounted for the highest share of people buying instant coffee, at 54%, followed by Brisbane, at 53%. Adelaide stood at 50%. Melbourne figure was roughly 53% while Sydney make up the smallest share of 45%.

Buying a fresh coffee was not popular amoung all these cities. Sydney made up the largest share, at 43%, followed closely by Melbourne at 42%. Hobart was approximatelt at 38% while Adelaide and Brisbane being the lowest at 34% and 33% respectively.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

You cover all three survey categories and provide a clear overview: café visits are highest overall, while fresh coffee purchases are generally lowest. The city-by-city comparisons are relevant, and most figures are close to the chart. One notable factual slip is Melbourne’s instant-coffee figure: you give roughly 53%, whereas it is about 48.5%; the other reported values are broadly accurate within the chart’s approximate readings. The overview is useful, though “most popular among all five cities” could be made more precise by noting that café visits lead in each city, while instant coffee exceeds fresh coffee everywhere. This clear selection and reporting of key features is effective, but a more exact overview and correction of the Melbourne figure would strengthen it further.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response is organised in a clear sequence: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for café visits, instant coffee, and fresh coffee. This makes the comparisons easy to follow, and phrases such as “followed closely by” and “respectively” help connect figures. The progression is logical throughout. Some linking and reference choices are less natural, however: “Melbourne figure” and “Sydney figure” would be clearer as “the figure for Melbourne/Sydney,” and the repeated pattern of listing cities and percentages makes the body somewhat formulaic. You could improve flexibility by grouping cities with similar results or directly contrasting the highest and lowest figures within each category.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportion,” “recorded,” “accounted for,” and “stood at,” and the meaning remains clear. However, several word-choice, collocation, and spelling problems limit precision. “The most popular amount” is not idiomatic for a category comparison; “team” appears instead of “tea”; and “made up the smallest share” is less natural here than “had the lowest proportion.” There are also spelling errors in “amoung” and “approximatelt.” Some reporting phrases are repeated, so vary them carefully without forcing synonyms. More accurate collocations and proofreading would make the vocabulary more natural and precise.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple statements and more developed comparative structures, such as “Melbourne recorded the highest proportion…, followed closely by Hobart.” Most sentences communicate the intended comparisons, and errors rarely obstruct understanding. Some grammatical patterns are not fully controlled: “going to cafe” needs an article, and “while Adelaide and Brisbane being the lowest” is an incomplete clause; write “while Adelaide and Brisbane were the lowest.” In “Melbourne figure was roughly 53%,” the missing article also affects the sentence structure. The response relies heavily on similar sentence patterns, so try adding accurate complex comparisons while checking articles, complete clauses, and agreement.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.