Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-17

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The bar chart gives information about people purchasing and consuming hot beverages such as tea and coffee in five Australian cities enlisted as Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart.The proportion of the consumers is measured in percentage.

Apparently, most of the people prefer having coffee and tea from the cafes, while less number of people bought fresh coffee in the past month and instant coffee is preferred by moderate amount of residents across the five cities.

Less than 50 percent of residents preferred buying fresh coffee in either of 5 cities. The residents like to have instant coffee averaging around 55 percent, marking the highest source of consumption in Adelaide. Atlast, majority of the residents liked to have coffee and tea from a cafe across Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Hobart, the most amount of people going to cafe can be seen in Melbourne estimating around 63 percent.

Minimal proportion of residents liked to buy fresh coffee making it the lowest in each of 5 cities. Brisbane and Adelaide are at the lowest to have fresh coffee consumers.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the chart’s main pattern: café visits are generally the most popular activity, while fresh coffee purchases are comparatively low. You also report relevant comparisons, including Melbourne’s café figure of about 63% and the low fresh-coffee results in Brisbane and Adelaide. This covers the task well, and the overview shows some of the sharper selection expected beyond a basic summary. However, the overview is not fully precise: instant coffee is not simply a “moderate” preference, as it is the leading category in Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart. The claim that fresh coffee is the lowest in every city is also inaccurate, since café visits are lower than fresh coffee in Adelaide. More exact city-by-city comparisons would strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, moving from an introduction and overview to details, and the final paragraph returns to a key feature. This gives the reader an overall route through the information. However, the progression is somewhat repetitive: the low level of fresh coffee is stated in both the third and final paragraphs, while the three categories are not consistently compared across cities. Connectors such as “Apparently” and “Atlast” feel mechanical or imprecise, and “Atlast” does not clearly signal the relationship between the preceding and following points. Grouping the figures into a clearer comparison—for example, café attendance versus the two purchase types—would make the organisation more logical and cohesion less repetitive.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportion,” “residents,” “preferred,” and “consumers,” and the meaning is generally clear. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “marking the highest source of consumption.” However, several choices are unnatural or imprecise for describing survey data: “enlisted as” for the city names, “less number of people,” and “the most amount of people” weaken fluency. “Consuming hot beverages” also suggests drinking, whereas the chart distinguishes purchases from café visits. Spelling and spacing in “Atlast” and the extra space before “in each” are minor presentation issues. Aim for precise collocations such as “the proportion who visited a café” and “the lowest figure.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use both simple statements and some more developed structures, including “while less number of people bought fresh coffee” and “Brisbane and Adelaide are at the lowest to have fresh coffee consumers.” The overall meaning remains understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “The proportion of the consumers is measured in percentage” has awkward article and number choices, and “in either of 5 cities” does not form a correct grammatical pattern. The sentence beginning “The residents like to have instant coffee averaging around 55 percent” also has an unclear relationship between the residents and the percentage. Punctuation and spacing need attention, particularly the missing space after “Hobart.” Use complete, direct comparisons with accurate articles and sentence boundaries to improve control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.