Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-26

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The bar chart illustrate about five Australians cities habit of coffee and tea buying and drinking.

By looking at the chart we can see that every city has different consumption rate.

Peoples of hobart , Melbourne and Sydney are in the top of the chart 60-65% for going to cafe for coffee or tea in last 4 weeks .But in Brisbane and Adelaide the chart flactuated to 55% and 50%. Brisbane and Adelaide are in the same position of 35% for buying fresh coffe in last 4 weeks where sydney in the top with 44% and melbourne is like in 43% thers just slight difference between them. Hobart bought the most instant coffee in last 4 weeks. 54% people of Hobart bought instant coffee in last 4 weeks which is the most among those cities. Melbourne and Adelaide residents has only slight difference of 48% and 50% for buying instant coffee in last 4 weeks

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify several relevant comparisons, including café visits being highest in Hobart, Melbourne and Sydney, and fresh-coffee purchases being lower in Brisbane and Adelaide. You also report approximate figures that broadly match the chart. However, the response does not give a clear overall summary of the main pattern across all three categories, and some comparisons are incomplete: for example, it does not mention that café visits peak in Melbourne and Hobart, or that instant coffee exceeds fresh coffee in every city. The opening statement that every city has a different consumption rate is vague and does not capture the key trends. A more complete overview, followed by a few carefully selected comparisons across all categories, would make the report more fully address the task.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response follows a generally understandable order: it begins with an introduction, then discusses café visits, fresh coffee and instant coffee. Comparisons such as Brisbane and Adelaide having similar fresh-coffee figures help connect related information. However, the ideas are crowded into one long paragraph, and the progression between categories is not always clearly signposted. The opening sentence about different consumption rates does not prepare the reader for the specific comparisons that follow. Some linking is also awkward, particularly the transition from café visits to fresh coffee within the same sentence. Organise the report into clear paragraphs, including a distinct overview, and use straightforward transitions such as “Regarding fresh coffee” to make the sequence easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “buying fresh coffee,” “instant coffee,” “residents” and “slight difference,” so the reader can understand the subject and many comparisons. However, the range is limited and some word choices or collocations are inaccurate or imprecise. “Consumption rate” is not the clearest description of the survey’s purchase and café-visit percentages, while “the chart fluctuated” incorrectly describes fixed comparisons rather than change over time. Spelling errors such as “flactuated” and “coffe,” along with inconsistent forms such as “Peoples,” reduce accuracy. Aim for precise reporting language such as “the proportion of residents” and “was higher,” and check spelling and collocations carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts to combine comparisons in longer sentences, but grammatical control is inconsistent, and errors sometimes make the relationships between ideas harder to follow. For example, “The bar chart illustrate” has subject–verb disagreement, and “Melbourne and Adelaide residents has” should use a plural verb. Articles and sentence construction are also problematic in “every city has different consumption rate.” Punctuation is unreliable: there are spaces before commas, missing spaces after full stops, and the final sentence lacks a clear ending. Most sentences rely on simple patterns or loosely joined clauses, so the range is limited. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement and article use, then build controlled complex sentences with clear punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.