Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The bar chart illustrates a survey about habbit of people drinking and buying coffee and tea of five australian cities.

It is evident from the chart that the percentage of people going to cafe for tea and coffee is continuously increased in all cities.

To begin,the ratio of buying fresh coffee in Sydney is less than 45% but greater in among all other cities. The proportion of people's buying fresh coffee in Brisbane and Adelaide is almost 35%. In Melbourne, people bought about 42% of fresh coffee which is the second highest ratio.In Hobart, people bought almost 39% fresh coffee.

Furthermore, people bought instant coffee in sydney was just above to 45%.In Hobart, people bought instant coffee almost 55% which greater than among all other cities.In Melbourne and Adelaide, people bought almost 49% instant coffee.And, people bought approximately 53% instant coffee.

Next,in Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart, approximately 63% people went to cafe for coffee or tea.the people went to cafe in Brisbane were almost 51%.In last,people came to cafe in Adelaide were just below than 50%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify all three survey categories and report several relevant comparisons, including the high fresh-coffee figures in Sydney and Melbourne and the high instant-coffee figure in Hobart. However, the overview is inaccurate: café visits did not increase continuously across the cities; they were highest in Melbourne and Hobart, while Adelaide was lowest. There are also important data errors, especially saying Brisbane café attendance was about 51% rather than roughly 56%, and describing Sydney as having the greatest fresh-coffee share when Melbourne is close and the figures need clearer comparison. The response therefore covers the chart only partially, with limited and sometimes unclear selection of its main features. Give a precise overview and check each comparison against the chart.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a basic structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate sections for fresh coffee, instant coffee, and café visits. This makes the categories reasonably easy to follow. However, progression within the paragraphs is sometimes mechanical, relying repeatedly on “To begin,” “Furthermore,” “Next,” and “In last.” The final sentence of the instant-coffee paragraph—“And, people bought approximately 53% instant coffee”—does not identify the city, so the reference is unclear and the information feels disconnected. Some sentences also run together because spacing after full stops is missing. Grouping comparisons more deliberately and using clear city references would make the organisation more coherent.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of chart vocabulary, including “percentage,” “proportion,” “approximately,” and “highest,” and the reader can generally understand the categories being compared. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or repetitive, such as “ratio of buying fresh coffee,” “people’s buying fresh coffee,” and “people came to cafe.” “Habits” is also more suitable than “habbit” in the introduction, and city names such as “Australian” and “Sydney” need capital letters. Repeated use of “people bought” limits flexibility. Aim for natural reporting phrases such as “the proportion of residents who purchased” and “the share who visited a café,” while checking spelling and capitalization.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

Most of the response uses short, simple statements, and the basic comparisons are usually understandable. However, grammatical errors occur frequently, and attempts to form longer sentences are often faulty. For example, “the percentage … is continuously increased” uses an incorrect verb form, while “people bought instant coffee in Sydney was” lacks a workable sentence structure. In “which greater than among all other cities,” the comparison is missing a verb and is not grammatically complete. Articles and prepositions are also often omitted or misused, as in “went to cafe” and “just below than 50%.” Use complete subject–verb structures, accurate past-tense reporting, and simpler comparison patterns before attempting more complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.