Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-30
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The given bar chart provides information about the results of a survey which shows people drinking habits and purchase of coffee and tea in last four weeks in five Australian cities.
Overall, In all the cities, the proportion of people went to a cafe for coffee or tea is higher than buying fresh coffee or instant coffee except Adelaide. Melbourne had the highest percentage of people who went to cafe whereas Adelaide had the lowest. Regarding, buying instant coffee, Hobart hold the largest share among all five cities and Sydney had the smallest share. Buying fresh coffee remained the lowest in all category.
In Melbourne, around 63% people went to a cafe for coffee or tea whereas nearly 49% people went to cafe in Adelaide. Approximately 54% bought Instant coffee in Hobart while the around 46% in Sydney. Brisbane and Adelaide had the lowest number of fresh coffee buyer, at nearly 34%.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You identify the main pattern that café visits were generally more common than either type of coffee purchase, and you report several relevant comparisons, including Melbourne’s high café figure and Adelaide’s low one. However, the overview is not fully accurate: café attendance was also below instant-coffee purchases in Adelaide, but it was higher than fresh-coffee purchases there, so “except Adelaide” is too broad. The claim that fresh coffee was “the lowest in all category” is also unclear, since it was not the lowest activity in every city when compared with café visits. Your selected figures are broadly consistent with the chart, but the response gives limited coverage of the city-by-city patterns and leaves some comparisons underdeveloped. A more precise overview and a few contrasting figures would strengthen the report.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and a paragraph with selected figures. This makes the information reasonably easy to follow, and comparisons such as Melbourne versus Adelaide are relevant. However, progression is limited because the final paragraph lists figures without clearly grouping them by activity or explaining how they relate to the overview. Some linking and punctuation choices also interrupt the flow, particularly “Regarding, buying instant coffee” and the capitalised “Overall, In”. The phrase “except Adelaide” is not sufficiently precise, which also makes the relationship between the overview and the data less clear. Organise the details around the three survey activities, and use transitions to show contrasts rather than relying on a sequence of separate figures.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
You use an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportion,” “percentage,” “share,” and “approximately,” and the reader can understand the main comparisons. There are, however, several awkward or imprecise choices. “People drinking habits and purchase” is not a natural description of the survey, while “fresh coffee buyer” and “lowest number” do not fit the percentage data as well as “proportion of residents.” “Hold the largest share” is also an unnatural collocation in this context. Capitalising “Instant” mid-sentence is inconsistent. These issues do not prevent understanding, but more precise and natural chart language would improve clarity. Aim to use terms such as “residents,” “accounted for,” and “percentage” consistently when describing proportions.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and more complex forms, including the overview sentence beginning “Overall” and comparisons using “whereas,” so there is some structural variety. Some grammatical errors remain, especially with articles, agreement, and verb forms. For example, “the proportion of people went” needs a relative clause or a noun phrase such as “the proportion of people who went”; “Hobart hold” should be “Hobart had”; and “63% people” needs “63% of people.” Article use is also inconsistent in “went to a cafe” and “the around 46%.” Punctuation and capitalisation in “Overall, In all the cities” and “Regarding, buying” are faulty. These errors rarely obscure the intended meaning, but careful editing of sentence patterns and articles would improve accuracy.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
