Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-11-04

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The bar chart illustrates the outcomes of a survey conducted on people's consumption behaviour about tea and drinks in five cities (Sydney,Melbourne,Brisbane,Adelaide and Hobart) of Australia.Overall,Australians had their most coffees in the cafes while fresh coffees recorded the least sales.However,instant coffees sales were considerably higher than fresh coffees in all cities of Australia.

In terms of coffee sales in cafe Melbourne and hobart recored nearly equal sales figures at 63% followed by Sydney at 61% approximately.While in Adelaide attendence in coffee shop was nearly as instant coffee sale about 50%.Moreover, Brisbane accounted for 55% of the coffee sales by cafes.

As concerned for instant coffee sales,it were the least in sydney about 45% as opposed exactly to 45% by Melbourne.In addition Brisbane and Adelaide had 55% and 50% of instant coffee sales respectively.However,Hobart accounted for 55% of instant coffee sales.Consequently, fresh coffees were among the least consumed nearly 35% both in Brisbane and Adelaide while nearly 40% in Hobart.By contrast,Sydney and Melbourne recorded a slightly increased figures as 44% and 42% respectively for the fresh coffee sales.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover all three measures across the five cities and include a useful overview: café visits are generally the highest, while fresh coffee is usually the lowest. Most reported figures and comparisons are close to the chart, including the café figures for Sydney and Adelaide and the fresh-coffee figures for Brisbane and Adelaide. However, the overview’s claim that fresh coffee recorded the least sales is too broad: in Brisbane and Adelaide, fresh coffee is lower than instant coffee, but in Sydney and Melbourne it is also below café visits, while the main pattern is better expressed as café attendance leading in four cities and instant coffee leading in Adelaide. Some details are unclear or inaccurate, such as saying Melbourne’s instant figure is “exactly” 45% rather than about 48.5%. Make the overview more precise and check each comparison.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction and overview are followed by paragraphs on café visits and coffee purchases. This makes the main categories easy to locate, and linking expressions such as “In addition” and “By contrast” help signal comparisons. However, the progression within the purchase paragraph is somewhat mechanical, with repeated “However” and “In addition,” and the relationship between some statements is not clear. For example, “it were the least in Sydney about 45% as opposed exactly to 45% by Melbourne” is difficult to follow and does not clearly distinguish the two cities’ figures. Use more direct comparisons and ensure each paragraph groups information consistently; clearer referencing and less repetitive linking would make the cohesion more natural.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “accounted for,” “followed by,” “as opposed to,” and “recorded,” and the reader can generally understand the comparisons. There are also attempts at more formal reporting language. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward: “had their most coffees,” “coffee sales in cafe,” and “attendance in coffee shop” do not express the chart’s categories naturally. “Fresh coffees” and “instant coffees sales” also use number and possessive forms inconsistently. Spelling errors such as “recored” further reduce precision. Prefer standard chart language such as “the proportion who visited cafés” and “bought instant coffee,” and check spelling and noun forms so that your otherwise relevant vocabulary is used accurately.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including contrast clauses beginning “while” and “whereas,” and most of the data remains understandable. Some grammatical errors occur in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries. For example, “it were the least” has incorrect agreement, while “Australians had their most coffees” is not a well-formed construction. Several sentences run together after full stops, as in “Australia.Overall” and “approximately.While,” and commas are missing around city lists and introductory phrases. These errors do not usually prevent the reader from following the message, but they make the report less controlled. Use complete sentences with consistent punctuation, and check subject–verb agreement and article use when describing each city’s figures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.