Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-11-09
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?
Student answer (Band 6.0)
In a few nations, it is considered essential for the citizens to own a house rather than renting one. There can be numerous reasons behind this opinion from societal pressure to social norms. According to my perspective, it is a negative development but depends on the person's financial condition and living requirements. So, in this essay, we will discuss benefits and drawbacks of both perspectives.
Having a own house provides a sense of security that owner is not going to liable to pay rent or answerable to anyone at the end of the month. However, it can be a negative approach to buy a own home when someone is not that much financially stable to afford but he try to do so, to fit in the social circle. Further, for this sake, people try to pick home loans from banks which eventually create a huge financial liability on them.
On the contrary, if someone is not under the influence of societal pressure or not following the established outdated social norms, and chooses his living space according to his requirement. He can choose a rented apartment based on his needs, probably a studio apartment if a single person or a small house if married. This approach would give much more financial freedom to invest for the other accessibilities such as a better or required vehicle.
In conclusion, on the basis of presented arguments, I concur with the notion that owning a home is a great investment but only when a person can afford it without any afterwards liability or due to peer pressure.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both parts of the prompt: you suggest that social pressure and norms explain the preference for ownership, and you give a qualified view that it is negative when people cannot afford it. The points about security, loans, and renters having more money for other needs are relevant. However, the reasons why home ownership is important in some countries are only briefly identified, and the discussion focuses more on the financial consequences than on the underlying cultural or social reasons. Your position also shifts: you call the situation negative, but conclude that owning a home is a great investment when affordable. Clarify whether you see the strong preference itself as positive or negative, then develop that judgement consistently with a specific explanation or example.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, two contrasting body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The progression from ownership to renting is easy to follow, and signposts such as “However” and “On the contrary” help show the contrast. This already gives the essay a coherent arrangement. Some linking is nevertheless mechanical or imprecise: “So, in this essay, we will discuss benefits and drawbacks of both perspectives” promises a balanced comparison, while the task asks for reasons and an evaluation. The conclusion also does not fully resolve the contrast in your position. Improve progression by making each paragraph serve a clear part of the question and use references and transitions that express the exact relationship between ideas.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “sense of security,” “financial liability,” “societal pressure,” and “financial freedom.” These expressions help communicate the main ideas, and attempts such as “established social norms” show some ambition beyond basic vocabulary. Some choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, however, as in “answerable to anyone,” “for this sake,” “other accessibilities,” and “afterwards liability.” “Outdated social norms” also makes a strong judgement without explaining it. Aim for more precise, natural combinations and avoid using formal-sounding words when their meaning does not fit. For example, describe the additional costs or financial obligations clearly rather than relying on vague expressions.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional structures such as “when someone is not that much financially stable” and a relative clause in “a studio apartment if a single person.” The main meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. Examples include “a own house” and “a own home,” missing or incorrect articles, and “the owner is not going to liable,” where the verb pattern is incomplete. The sentence beginning “On the contrary, if someone…” is also a fragment because the conditional clause is not joined to a complete main clause. Practise article use, verb patterns after “going to,” and completing conditional sentences. Breaking long or loosely connected sentences into accurate clauses will improve control without limiting structural variety.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.