Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Housing has been a critical issue in most of the countries including Australia. In some contries, people argue that it is important to own a house rather than renting, in that it creates more freedom and also it can be used for security purposes. However, the cost of buying a house can be extremely high hence not everyone can afford.

To begin, owning a house gives people the autonomy to do whatever they want to do with their property. For instance, rented property always have a routine check for inspections as well as some of the interrior designs cannot be altered because of the owner rules and preferrences, hence making it hard to customise the house .But for the owners, they can customise their houses without any permission from anyone. A house can also be used for security purpose. For example, someone can borrow loans from thebank and use the house as a security. Despite these positive outcomes, owning a house can be stressful and now everyone can afford to buy a house,especilly those from low income. In Australia today, a house costs approximately 800,000 Australian dollars hence someone with less income is unable to buy a house.

To conclude, I think owning a house is important in that it can be used for security purpoese as well as creating freedom. But it's cost can prevent other people from owning a house, hence goverment should come up with policies to regulate the prices of houses, as well as providing some subsidies to increase the home ownership among low income people.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both parts of the question: you explain why ownership matters, citing autonomy over a home and the ability to use it as loan security, and you give a clear view that the situation has benefits but affordability is a concern. The examples about inspections and the Australian housing cost make the discussion relevant. This meets the task well, but the reasons and your evaluation are not equally developed: the security point is brief, and the conclusion mainly repeats earlier ideas rather than weighing whether home ownership is, overall, positive or negative. To strengthen the response, explain more fully why ownership is valued in the countries concerned and state a more decisive overall judgement, while supporting it with a developed consequence or example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall shape, moving from an introduction to a body paragraph and a conclusion, and the main ideas are generally easy to follow. Sequencing phrases such as “To begin,” “For instance,” and “To conclude” help signal the stages of the argument. However, the body paragraph combines several points—customisation, loan security, and affordability—so the progression between them is sometimes abrupt. The repeated use of “hence” also makes some links feel mechanical, and the reference in “Despite these positive outcomes” is not fully precise because the paragraph has just shifted to the security example. Give each main reason or contrast clearer development, and use a wider range of natural links and explicit references to improve flow.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “autonomy,” “security,” “customise,” “inspections,” and “subsidies,” which helps communicate the main points. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “low income” and “home ownership.” However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward: “security purposes” and “security purpose” would be more naturally expressed as “collateral” or “security for a loan,” while “the owner rules and preferrences” is unclear. Spelling errors such as “contries,” “interrior,” and “especilly” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise housing and finance vocabulary, check spelling carefully, and avoid repeating broad terms such as “important” and “house” when a more specific expression is available.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “someone with less income is unable to buy a house” and a contrast introduced by “Despite these positive outcomes.” The overall meaning remains understandable, but some grammatical errors and punctuation problems are noticeable. For example, “rented property always have” has a subject–verb agreement error, and “not everyone can afford” needs an object such as “one” or “a house.” The sentence beginning “Despite these positive outcomes” is also awkwardly joined to the preceding idea, and spacing around punctuation is inconsistent. Work on agreement, complete verb patterns, and sentence boundaries; then proofread punctuation and articles. More consistently accurate complex sentences would improve control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.