Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-08-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In few nations, it is believed that home ownership is more beneficial for people in comparison to renting one. The major reason behind this could be the flexibility provided by home ownership. However, in the long run, this trend might create some serious problems like unaffordability.

To begin with, people could customize the house without any restrictions if they are the owners. Regarding renting, people's requirements are unique and they can't be fulfilled completely without getting permissions from the landlord. Alternatively, people can directly address their needs if they own the residence without consulting with anyone. For instance, a family that wants to construct a swimming pool in the backyard would not have to consult with anyone to build it, which might not be possible in a rented home. As a result, higher flexibility attracts people in owning the house.

Despite the greater flexibility, this situation could make housing unaffordable in the future. Firstly, inclination of people towards home ownership could significantly increase the demand for houses. As the number of houses are in limited figure, their rates might witness a huge jump. Consequently, in spite of working for a prolonged time period, an average person could not be able to purchase a house . For example, if all the people in a small country like Nepal would want to own a house, then the prices could climb significantly, which makes it impossible for an average Nepali to buy a house.

In conclusion, the transformations that can be done to a house without any restrictions have influenced people to own houses rather than renting them. Although it might sound fascinating, in the long run, it will be impossible for a common person to buy a house.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt: the reasons for the importance of home ownership and the writer's opinion on whether this is positive or negative. The ideas are relevant, particularly the focus on customization and the economic impact of demand. However, the development is somewhat limited; the argument regarding unaffordability could be more nuanced by discussing other factors like interest rates or urban planning. The position is clear throughout, and the conclusion effectively summarizes the main points. To reach a higher band, ensure that the supporting examples are more universally applicable rather than relying on specific country examples like Nepal, which can sometimes limit the scope of the argument.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the two main ideas. Cohesive devices such as 'To begin with', 'Alternatively', 'Despite', and 'Consequently' are used to guide the reader through the argument. However, some transitions are slightly mechanical, and the referencing could be smoother. For instance, the phrase 'in owning the house' at the end of the second paragraph is a bit repetitive. Overall, the progression of ideas is clear, and the structure supports the development of the argument effectively.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task. The writer uses some topic-specific terms like 'customise', 'unaffordability', and 'prolonged time period'. There are some minor inaccuracies in collocation and word choice, such as 'in limited figure' (should be 'in limited supply') and 'transformations that can be done' (should be 'modifications that can be made'). While the range is sufficient to convey meaning clearly, it lacks the sophistication and precision required for higher bands. Expanding the use of less common lexical items and improving collocations would enhance the quality of the writing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'In few nations' (should be 'In some nations'), 'number of houses are' (should be 'number of houses is'), and 'could not be able to' (should be 'would not be able to'). While these errors do not impede communication, they occur frequently enough to prevent a higher score. The use of modal verbs like 'could' and 'might' is appropriate for expressing opinions, but the control over subject-verb agreement and article usage needs more attention to achieve greater accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.