Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In today's globalized and interconnected world, there has been a considerable debate over whether owning a home is more important than renting. I firmly believe it is a positive situation to have one's own house.

One of the main reasons is that, in the era of rising costs, if a tenant is unable to pay the rent on time by the end of the month due to financial issues, the landlord can issue a notice to vacate the house without a second thought. In this case, the tenant may take out a debt to pay the rent, but if the financial issues continue, the tenant has to vacate the house. For instance, if a job holder doesn't get paid on time or loses his job by the end of the month, he will be unable to pay the rent. This is the case where he should have his own house as a backup because the future is unpredictable.

Furthermore, a homeowner can paint, furnish, change the design, or fix their home with their own choices without asking for permission. They have the freedom of choice. Moreover, it gives emotional well-being and peace of mind to the homeowner without any stress of collecting rent. Additionally, the value of the property increases over time, so the house can be a valuable asset for generations.

In conclusion, however, owning a house requires a massive amount of money and a lot of hard work, which can lead to heavy debt. Having one's own property has long-term, undeniably profound benefits.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction, and the response addresses both why home ownership matters and whether it is positive. The points about housing security, freedom to alter a property, emotional well-being and long-term value are relevant, with the job-loss example helping to illustrate insecurity for renters. This gives the response a solid, focused basis. However, the reasons are not all developed equally: the discussion of financial security repeats the possibility of rent arrears and eviction, while the benefits of ownership are mostly listed rather than explained. The prompt also invites a broader account of why ownership is especially important in some countries; explaining cultural expectations or the desire for stability would make that part more complete and the argument more fully supported.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present reasons, and a conclusion restates the position while acknowledging a drawback. Linking expressions such as “Furthermore,” “Moreover,” and “In conclusion” make the progression easy to follow. The main limitation is that some connections feel mechanical, and several ideas in the second body paragraph are placed in a list rather than developed through clear relationships. For example, freedom to decorate, peace of mind and property value are all introduced in quick succession without explaining how they support the central argument. The reference “In this case” is also somewhat vague. Use fewer formulaic transitions and build each paragraph around a main point, followed by explanation and a specific consequence.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “financial issues,” “emotional well-being,” “peace of mind,” “valuable asset” and “unpredictable.” These choices communicate the main ideas clearly, and some phrases show an attempt to use more formal language. At times, however, word choice or collocation is imprecise: “take out a debt” is less natural than “go into debt,” and “with their own choices” does not express the intended freedom as idiomatically as “to suit their preferences.” “Job holder” is also an awkward label in this context. Greater precision and more natural collocations would make the argument sound more fluent and controlled. Try to avoid relying on broad phrases such as “financial issues” when a more specific description is available.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 7.0

You demonstrate a useful mix of sentence forms, including conditional structures (“if a tenant is unable to pay…”) and a complex sentence with a relative clause (“a homeowner can…fix their home with their own choices”). Many sentences are accurate and the meaning remains clear throughout. There are a few grammatical slips, particularly in the example: “if a job holder doesn't get paid on time or loses his job by the end of the month” combines an unclear time reference with a conditional that would be clearer in a consistent hypothetical form. The phrase “without any stress of collecting rent” also has an awkward grammatical construction. Review conditional consistency and article/preposition patterns, and check that pronouns and time expressions clearly match the situation. More varied, accurately controlled complex sentences would strengthen the response.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.