Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

the following graph demonstrate the number of visitors to the caribean island between year 2010 and 2017.

overall the total number of turist visited caribean island increased over the period of 7years with some veriationn ,with the visitors staying on the criuse recorded highest in the start and with some flutuations,diped down the number of tourist liked to stay on island,which was lower in the start.

To start with ,the tourist visited island recorded the lowest of about 1million in 2010 ,which gradually inclined with some variation and acquired its peak of around 3.5 million in 2017.

regarding number of visitors staying on island,most teurist used to stay on island in 2010 of about .7 million .the figure steadily surge with the slight dip in 2011, to reached to its maximun of around 1.5 million in 2013.Beyond that it maintain its position with a decline in 2016 where it decreased to about 1.3 million.In contrast less people liked to stay on cruise,in 2010 which was about .2 million.However the number increased in 2011 to around 0.5 million,declined to 0.2million again in 2013 and finally inclined to by bypassing the visitor stayed on the cruise and finally recorded the highest number of visitor who stayed on cruise in 2017 ,reached to about 2million.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main overall rise in total visitors and describe the broad patterns for both accommodation types, including the island figure’s relative stability after 2013 and the cruise-ship increase towards 2017. These are relevant features and the response covers the graph. However, the overview is unclear and contains a major reversal: cruise-ship visitors were not highest at the start; they were lowest then and reached their peak in 2017. The account also confuses the total series with visitors staying on the island when it says the total reached 3.5 million. Some details are imprecise, such as the island figure’s peak being reached in 2013 rather than remaining around 1.5 million through 2015. A clearer, accurate overview and more careful separation of the three series would strengthen the report.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and paragraphs describing the figures. It also uses sequencing and contrast markers such as “To start with,” “Beyond that,” and “In contrast,” which help signal relationships between points. However, progression is weakened when the overview mixes up the series and when the final sentence becomes difficult to follow, particularly “finally inclined to by bypassing the visitor stayed on the cruise.” Some linking phrases are mechanical or attached to long, crowded sentences, and references such as “the figure” are not always clear about which series is being discussed. Organise the body by clearly naming each series and use shorter sentences to make comparisons and changes easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of trend vocabulary, including “gradually,” “variation,” “decline,” “peak,” and “in contrast,” which is appropriate for describing a graph. However, inaccurate word choice, spelling, and collocation are frequent enough to make parts of the report awkward or unclear. Examples include “inclined” for an upward trend, “surge” where the increase is gradual, and “liked to stay” for a neutral description of visitor accommodation. There are also repeated spelling errors such as “turist,” “flutuations,” and “maximun.” Aim for precise, conventional reporting language and check spelling carefully; using a smaller set of accurate terms will communicate the trends more effectively than forcing less suitable alternatives.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You make some attempts to combine information in complex sentences, for example with “which” clauses and contrastive structures. However, control of sentence structure and verb forms is inconsistent, and several sentences are difficult to parse. In “the tourist visited island recorded the lowest,” the article and verb construction are faulty; “to reached” should use a consistent verb form, and “it maintain its position” needs past-tense agreement. The overview also contains a run-on sequence of clauses with unclear connections. Use complete sentences with clear subjects, maintain past tense for the historical data, and check agreement and articles. More accurate control of these basic patterns would make your ideas much easier to understand.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.