Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The line graph illustrate the information regarding the tourists visiting caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 and compared visitors who staying on crusie ship and visitor staying on island.

Overall, In 2017 the total number of visitor is highest among all the years , while early year the tourists who stayed on crusie ship show a fluctuated growth whereas, the tourisits who stayed on island rose sharply and experience the flat growth which over take by cruise ship visitors.

In 2010, The total visitor is about 1 million which comparises of half million stayed on island and quater of it stayed on cruise ship, the total number of tourists kept increased and reached to 2 million in total number of visitors but crusie ship tourists show slightly decreased which rose sharply in 2013, while the island visitors experienced some levelled off in 2013.

Moving to further detail, the total number of visitor reached the 2.5 million mark which have around 1.5 million island visitors and 1 million cruise ship tourists. By contrast, in 2017 the total number of tourists touched the mark of 3.5 million which involves about 2 million tourists stayed on cruise ship and 1.5 million on island tourists.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the overall rise in total visitors and describe the contrasting patterns for the two accommodation groups, which addresses the main features of the graph. Several figures are also reported accurately, including the 2014 total of about 2.5 million and the 2017 total of 3.5 million. However, some details are unclear or inaccurate: in 2010, island visitors were about 0.75 million, not half a million, and cruise-ship visitors were about 0.25 million, not a quarter of the total expressed as though it were a separate figure. The account of the early years is also confusing: the total rose to 1.5 million in 2012 and 2 million in 2013, while cruise visitors fluctuated rather than showing a clear rise until later. A clearer overview of the crossover in 2016 would strengthen the report.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and two detail paragraphs. This gives the information an overall coherent arrangement, and phrases such as “Overall” and “Moving to further detail” help signal the stages of the report. However, progression within the detail paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow. The third paragraph moves between the total, cruise visitors, and island visitors without consistently anchoring each figure to a year. In addition, “By contrast” does not clearly express the relationship between the 2014 and 2017 figures, and the long sentence beginning “the total number of tourists kept increased” contains several trends at once. Organise the data chronologically and use clearer references to each year and series to make the comparisons easier to track.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “total number,” “visitors,” “rose sharply,” and “levelled off,” and the reader can generally understand the trends you intend to describe. However, word choice and collocation are often imprecise or repetitive. For example, “kept increased” is not a natural way to describe a continuing rise, while “touched the mark” is less suitable than a neutral reporting phrase. There are also spelling errors in key terms, including “crusie,” “tourisits,” and “quater,” which reduce accuracy. Build a more reliable set of graph-description expressions and check spelling carefully; this will help you report changes and comparisons with greater precision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including clauses linked with “while” and “whereas,” and the main message is usually recoverable. However, grammatical control is uneven, particularly in subject–verb agreement, articles, and verb forms. Examples include “The line graph illustrate,” “the total number of visitor is highest,” and “the tourists who stayed on island rose sharply and experience.” Some sentences also have faulty construction, such as “which over take by cruise ship visitors,” making the intended relationship unclear. Punctuation and capitalisation are inconsistent, especially after full stops. Practise forming accurate comparison sentences with a clear subject and verb, and check agreement and tense before adding subordinate clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.