Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The line graph tracks the information about Caribbean island that how many number of tourists visiting there during the time period of 2010 - 2017.

Overall, this graph contains two categories of visitors first who stay on cruise ships which are represented by triangular edges line, second who stay on island which are demonstrated by doted line with square edges. Additionally, a line which describes the total of both represented by round edges line is also observed on graph. Furthermore, millions of visitors ranges from 0 to 3.5 are ploted on Y axis, whereas, different years ranges from 2010 to 2017 are ploted on X axis.

Initially, visitors who are staying on cruise ships stands between 0 to 0.5 in 2010 and steadily grow, but after 2011 it become gradually decline, again accounted between 0 to 0.5. However, it darmaticaly raise without falling and in 2017 it reaches to 2 million visitors. Moreover, Visitors who staying on island are 1 million in 2010 and plateaued in 2011. Nevertheless, it swiftly increase and stands at 1.5 in 2013, but is again leveled off between 2013 to 2015 at 1.5 then fall and raise. In addition to this, total of both categories embark from 1 million visitors and it exponential grow without any plunged, at the final it reaches to 3.5 million.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the graph’s subject and report the broad rise in total visitors, including the final figure of 3.5 million. You also describe the main pattern for both visitor groups, so the response addresses the task. However, some details are inaccurate: island visitors were about 0.75 million in 2010, not 1 million, and cruise-ship visitors rose from 0.25 million to 0.5 million in 2011 before falling back to 0.25 million in 2012. The overview mainly explains the graph’s lines and axes rather than highlighting its key trends. Make the overview more analytical—for example, note that total numbers increased overall and cruise-ship visitors grew especially strongly, while island visitors levelled off.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and a paragraph describing the data. The figures are generally presented in chronological order, and linking expressions such as “However,” “Moreover,” and “Nevertheless” help signal relationships. At times, though, cohesion feels mechanical because many transitions are added without clarifying the comparison, and references such as “it” are not always immediately clear. The overview also spends space describing line styles and axes, interrupting the progression from the main trends to supporting details. Group the information around the overall pattern and the two visitor categories, and use fewer, more precise links—for instance, contrast the steady island figures with the sharper rise in cruise-ship visitors.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of trend vocabulary, including “plateaued,” “steadily,” “decline,” and “reaches,” which helps communicate changes over time. However, several choices are inaccurate or unnatural for describing a graph: “darmatically raise,” “exponential grow,” “without any plunged,” and “embark from” do not express the intended trends naturally. There are also spelling errors, including “ploted” and “doted,” and some repetitive use of “visitors” and “represented.” Choose standard collocations such as “rose sharply,” “increased steadily,” “remained stable,” and “reached a peak.” More precise vocabulary, used accurately rather than embellished, would make the account clearer and more fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “whereas,” “but,” and “which,” and the overall meaning is usually understandable. However, some recurring grammatical errors reduce accuracy. For example, “how many number of tourists visiting there” lacks a correct clause structure, while “visitors who are staying … stands” has problems with tense and subject–verb agreement. Articles and sentence construction are also inconsistent in phrases such as “on graph” and “at the final it reaches.” Use a clear introductory sentence such as “The graph shows how many tourists visited the island from 2010 to 2017,” then maintain past tense and check agreement in each description. Shorter, controlled sentences would help alongside your complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.