Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-10

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The line graph illustrates the number of tourists who visited a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.It also show the number of visitors stayed on cruise ships and vistiors satyed on island.

Overall, the figure significantly increased over the period and the touch peak at the end of the period.While the vistors staying on cruise ships rose before stable trend whereas visitors who stayed on island falacute over the time and take over who stayed on ships.

In 2010, the figure stood at 1 millon combined about 0.7 vistiors on cruise ships and 0.3 vistiors who spend time on island .In between 2011 and 2013 ,total tourists recored increaing number and touches 2 millions of tourists where tourist who lived in cruise ships depicts slight dip before shows stable figure with 0.5 millions but visitors who lived on island climb upto 1.5 million which was highest .

In the end of a preiod , total numbers of visitors increased throughout the years and recored the highest figure at last with 3.5 millions people.Similar trend can seen in people who stayed at cruise ships and touches 2 millions at 2017 . In contrast , visitors who stayed on island dip before staying at 1.5 millons at the end.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover the main overall rise and report several relevant figures, including the total reaching 3.5 million in 2017 and cruise-ship visitors reaching 2 million. You also note that island-staying visitors dipped before ending at 1.5 million. However, some details are inaccurate: in 2010, cruise-ship visitors were about 0.25 million and island visitors about 0.75 million, not the reverse. The claim that cruise-ship numbers became stable after a dip is unclear, since they rose overall after 2012. Your overview also says island visitors “falacute” and “take over” cruise visitors, which does not clearly describe the data; island visitors remained higher until 2016, when the figures were equal. More precise comparisons and a clearer overview would strengthen the report.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and paragraphs describing earlier and later years. This gives the reader a general route through the information, and phrases such as “In contrast” help signal a comparison. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow because several trends and figures are combined in long sentences. For example, the sentence beginning “In between 2011 and 2013” moves between the total and both visitor categories without clearly separating their changes. Some linking phrases are also awkward or repetitive, including “In the end of a period” and “Similar trend can seen.” Grouping the series more systematically and using clearer references would make the relationships easier to understand.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “figure,” “increased,” “dip,” “stable,” and “in contrast,” so the reader can identify the broad trends being described. However, the range and control are limited by repeated general terms such as “figure,” “visitors,” and “number,” as well as inaccurate or unnatural choices. “Touch peak,” “lived in cruise ships,” and “falacute” do not express the intended data trends clearly. There are also noticeable spelling errors, for example “millon,” “vistiors,” “recored,” and “preiod.” Aim for precise chart language such as “rose to,” “remained steady,” and “reached a peak,” and check spelling and collocations carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “while” and “whereas,” and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, some grammatical errors make relationships between ideas unclear. Examples include “It also show” instead of “It also shows,” “the figure significantly increased … and the touch peak,” and “Similar trend can seen.” There are problems with articles, verb forms, agreement, and sentence boundaries; for instance, the opening runs two sentences together after “2017.” Several long sentences also lack clear grammatical structure, particularly the sentence beginning “In between 2011 and 2013.” Practise accurate past-tense reporting and build complex sentences around one clear comparison at a time.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.