Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-16
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 4.5)
The given graphic lines shows the comparisons of the numbers of tourists visiting the Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.
There were two different type of visitors who stayed in cruise ship and on island. Some visitors preffered to stayed on cruise ships while some preffered to stayed on islands. In 2010 people who visited Caribbean island was 0.3% who stayed on cruise ships while other visitors preffered to stay on island which was 0.8%, In 2011 many visitors visited Caribbean island who tavelled by cruise ships or from other sources. Some of people decided to stay on cruise ships the total estimated percentage was 0.5 and some people decided to stay on island which was 0.7. The one of graphic line indicates that the total percentage of people who stayed on cruise and islands was 1% in 2010 and same in 2011 which was 1.3% which is the increase of 0.3% who visited
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.5 |
| Overall | 4.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0
The response identifies the two visitor categories and gives some figures for 2010 and 2011, so it shows a basic understanding of the graph. However, it reports only the opening years and does not summarise the main overall pattern or the important changes through 2017. The statement that the total was “1% in 2010 and same in 2011” is inaccurate: the total rose from about 1 million to 1.25 million, and these are numbers of visitors, not percentages. The response also does not highlight that cruise-ship visitors rose markedly while island-staying numbers were comparatively stable. To improve, give a clear overview and select accurate start- and end-point comparisons across the full period.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0
There is an attempt to introduce the graph and then describe visitor types and figures, but the information is not arranged into a clear, coherent summary. The response moves from the categories to 2010 and then 2011, repeating ideas such as “some visitors preferred” without developing a progression across the years. The final sentence breaks off at “who visited,” leaving the comparison incomplete. Linking words such as “while” and “which” are used, but they do not make the relationships between figures consistently clear. Organise the report into a brief introduction, an overview of the main trends, and a paragraph comparing the figures over time; ensure each sentence is complete and connected to the next.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The response uses a basic range of relevant terms, including “visitors,” “cruise ships,” “island,” “increase,” and “graphic line,” and the reader can generally identify the topic. However, vocabulary is repetitive, and several choices are inaccurate or awkward for describing a graph. “Percentage” is repeatedly used for values that represent millions of visitors, while “graphic line” is not a natural way to refer to a data series. There are also noticeable spelling and word-form errors, including “preffered” and “tavelled,” which reduce precision. Aim to use standard chart language consistently, such as “number,” “figure,” “total,” “rose,” and “remained stable,” and check spelling before submitting.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5
The response attempts some longer sentences, for example, “Some visitors preferred to stayed on cruise ships while some preferred to stayed on islands,” but the structures are often faulty and the range remains limited. After “preferred,” the verb should be in the -ing form or an infinitive, not “to stayed.” Other problems include subject–verb agreement in “The given graphic lines shows” and “people who visited … was,” as well as missing or inconsistent sentence punctuation. The final sentence is incomplete, which makes its meaning difficult to follow. Practise accurate simple sentences first, then combine them using clauses such as “while” and “whereas”; check agreement, verb forms, and sentence endings carefully.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
