Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-17
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The line graph depicts the number of tourists visiting a particular caribbean island between 2010 and 2017. Showing the total as well as those who visitors staying on cruise ships as well as staing on island.
As an overall assessment, it can clearly be seen that total number of tourists visiting a caribbean island was only 1 million to significant rose during the period.the number of visitors staying on cuise ships was ratio drastically ascalated during the period and overtook it by 2017.
Getting back to the details,In 2010, the total number of tourists was 1 million after that this ratio yearly chaneged in 2011 was 1.5 millions then this ratio drastically gained form 2011 to 2016 have 2.7 millions after that In 2017 this ratio rose in 3.5 millions.The visitors staying on cruise ships In 2010 was only 0.2 millions then this ratio gained in 0.5 million in 2011 after that plummeted 0.1 million then continuously grew form 2012 to 2017.
Based on the line graph, the visitors stayin on island in 2010 was only 0.7 millions then this ratio stable in 2011 then rose form 2011 to 2016 then declined 1 millions then again rose in 2017.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You identify the chart’s subject and report the broad rise in total visitors, as well as growth in cruise-ship visitors. However, the overview is not fully accurate: cruise-ship visitors did not overtake island-staying visitors by 2017; the figures are about 2 million and 1.5 million respectively, while the total reaches 3.5 million. Several details are also misreported or unclear: the total was about 1.25 million in 2011, not 1.5 million, and island visitors rose to 1.5 million by 2013, then stayed broadly stable before a small dip. You cover all three series, but the key comparisons and changes need more precise reporting and clearer development.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate detail sections for the visitor categories. This gives the reader a basic route through the information. However, progression within the detail paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow, particularly in the total figures, where several years and changes are compressed into one long sentence. Linking phrases such as “after that,” “then,” and “based on the line graph” are repeated mechanically, and some references such as “this ratio” are unclear. Organise the figures into clearer comparisons—for example, describe the total and cruise-ship trend together, then contrast these with island stays—and use more precise referencing to make the sequence easier to track.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some relevant chart vocabulary, including “total,” “visitors staying on cruise ships,” “stable,” “declined,” and “rose,” so the main subject is generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, such as “this ratio yearly changed,” “gained form,” and “ratio drastically escalated.” Repeated use of “ratio” does not accurately describe visitor numbers, and spelling errors such as “caribbean,” “staing,” “cuise,” and “chaneged” are noticeable. Aim for precise terms such as “number,” “figure,” and “visitor total,” and use natural trend phrases. This would make the description clearer and more appropriate to an academic report.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5
You attempt to combine information across years, but sentence control is inconsistent and the response relies heavily on simple or loosely connected clauses. For example, “In 2010, the total number of tourists was 1 million after that this ratio yearly changed…” lacks clear sentence boundaries, while “the visitors stayin on island in 2010 was…” has problems with article use and subject–verb agreement. Tense and sentence construction are also unreliable in phrases such as “then this ratio stable in 2011.” Use complete sentences with a consistent past tense, and check agreement and articles. Breaking long sequences into shorter sentences would help you control punctuation and make the information easier to understand.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
