Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-18

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The graph elucidates the number of tourists visiting a particular caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.The chart compares different categories and present the data in numbers.Overall,it is clear that there are noticeable difference among the categories shown in the chart, visitors staying on cruise ships appear to be high,while visitors staying on island are the opposite of it.in addition,some categories show some fluctuation by following increment as well as decrement whereas for some cases they remain stable.According to the chart,visitors staying on cruise ships in 2010 was 2.5 lac and 2011 5 lac visitors staying on cruise ships.2012 the visitors decreas then 2013 again increase 5 lac.2014 one million visitors staying in cruise ships.2016 1.5 millions vistors staying on cruise ships at the end in 2017 2 millions visitors staying on cruise ships.visitors staying on island in 2010 75 lac and 2012 12 lac vistors staying on island.2013 1.5 millions of vistors staying on islanda nd 3 years they remain stable in 2016 visitors can decreas and then 2017 1.5 millions visitors staying on island.2015 the total visitord are 2.5 millions above and the end in 2017 3.5 millions visitors staying on island.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You identify the period and both visitor categories, and you include several figures, so the response is relevant to the graph. However, the overview is unclear and partly inaccurate: cruise-ship visitors were not consistently “high” compared with island visitors; island stays were higher until 2016, when cruise visitors overtook them. Several figures are misreported or confusing, including “2012 12 lac” for island visitors (about 1.25 million) and the claim that the 2015 total was 2.5 million (about 2.75 million). The final figure of 3.5 million is the total, not visitors staying on the island. To strengthen the report, give a clear overview of the overall rise and the changing relationship between the two groups, then select accurate key comparisons.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0

The response follows a broadly chronological order and mentions cruise-ship visitors before island visitors, which gives the reader a basic route through the information. However, ideas are crowded into one paragraph and the progression is difficult to follow. The opening overview combines several vague claims, while the data section often runs figures together without clear sentence boundaries, as in “2012 the visitors decreas then 2013 again increase.” Linking phrases such as “in addition” and “at the end” are used, but they do not consistently clarify how the information relates. Separate the introduction, overview and detail into paragraphs, and group the figures into clear trend descriptions with accurate transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “visitors,” “categories,” “fluctuation,” “increment” and “decrement,” and the reader can generally recognise the subject. However, the range is limited and several choices are inaccurate or unnatural, which sometimes makes the data hard to interpret. For example, “the opposite of it” is unclear, and “following increment as well as decrement” is an awkward way to describe changes. “Lac” is also unsuitable here and creates confusion when reporting values in millions. Spelling errors such as “vistors” and “decreas” further reduce precision. Use standard graph language such as “rose,” “fell,” “remained stable,” and “approximately 1.25 million,” and avoid repeating the same nouns unnecessarily.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

There are attempts to form longer sentences and to use time references, but sentence control is weak and errors frequently affect clarity. Examples include “visitors staying on cruise ships in 2010 was” (subject–verb agreement), “2012 the visitors decreas then 2013 again increase” (missing sentence structure and incorrect verb forms), and “3 years they remain stable” (unclear construction and tense). Articles, plurals and punctuation are also inconsistently controlled; for instance, several sentences run together without spaces after full stops. Most reporting relies on fragments or simple patterns rather than a controlled range of structures. Build complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, keep past-tense forms consistent, and check agreement and sentence boundaries.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.