Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-18

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The line chart demonstrates the number of visitors of a particular Caribbean island between the years 2010 and 2017.

Overall, the chart depicts the numbers of tourist who stayed on island and ones who used cruise ships for staying purposes and the total visitors. In initial years tourists prefered stays of island over cruise ships. In contrast, as years passed the cruise ships become more favourable for tourists.

Firstly, in 2010 the number of visitors who took stays on island was around 0.8 millions, while approximately 0.3 millions visitors chose cruise ships. Meanwhile, the total number of tourists touched 1 million. Secondly, the number of visitors who stayed on island stayed static till 2011 but afterwards it rose drastically and stayed consistant at 1.5 millions of visitors for 3 consecutive years from 2013 to 2015. Moreover the number dropped in 2016. after all fluctuations numbers of visitors concluded at 1.5 million respectively in 2017.

Consequently, the numbers of visitors who stayed on cruise started relatively lower than island. it fluctuated between years 2010 to 2012. Furthermore, the numbers of tourists who chose cruise for stays jumped drastically and overcross the numbers of visitors who stayed on island in between year 2015 abd 2016. Finally, it reached at its pick of 2 million in the year 2017. Whereas, the number of total visitors increased dramatically and reached at 3.5 million in 2017.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

You cover the main features and provide a clear overview: island-based visitors were more numerous initially, cruise-ship visitors rose substantially, and total arrivals reached about 3.5 million in 2017. Most figures and trends are accurately reported, including the island figure of around 1.5 million from 2013 to 2015 and the cruise-ship peak of 2 million. The comparison that cruise visitors overtook island visitors is also relevant, although the timing is imprecise: this happened between 2016 and 2017, not between 2015 and 2016. To strengthen the report further, make comparisons more precise and avoid broad claims such as cruise ships becoming more favourable without specifying the crossover and the continuing lead of island stays until then.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs describing island stays and cruise-ship visitors. The information generally progresses chronologically, and linking expressions such as “Moreover,” “Furthermore,” and “Finally” help signal additions and changes. This gives the report a coherent arrangement. However, some transitions feel mechanical or do not express the relationship accurately: “Consequently” does not logically introduce the cruise-ship series, and “Firstly” and “Secondly” are not especially useful for organising chart data. The reference in “after all fluctuations numbers” is also unclear. Use more direct links between the two series and make comparisons within the same paragraph to create smoother progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant chart vocabulary, including “fluctuated,” “static,” “increased,” and “reached,” and the reader can understand the main trends. However, several noticeable word-choice, collocation, and spelling problems limit precision. For example, “took stays on island” and “cruise for stays” are unnatural; “overcross” is not the appropriate verb for the crossover; and “pick” should be “peak.” There are also misspellings such as “prefered,” “consistant,” and “abd.” Repeated use of “number of visitors” and “tourists” makes the vocabulary less flexible. Build a more accurate range of standard reporting phrases, such as “the figure for,” “stayed at,” and “overtook,” and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and longer sentences, including clauses introduced by “while” and “whereas,” and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, errors occur frequently in sentence structure, agreement, articles, and punctuation. Examples include “the numbers of tourist,” “the cruise ships become more favourable,” and “the number dropped in 2016. after all fluctuations,” where agreement, tense, and sentence boundaries need attention. The phrase “reached at its pick” also shows an incorrect grammatical pattern. These recurring errors make some sentences awkward and reduce accuracy, even though the main message remains understandable. Practise consistent past-tense reporting, singular/plural agreement, and complete sentence boundaries; then proofread longer sentences for clause structure and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.