Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given line chart gives information about tourists number staying at diiferent locations on a specific Caribbean island over the period from 2010 to 2017.

Overall, it can be observed that the figure for visitiors staying at cruise ships increased across years depite a slight decline, while the number of explorers staying on island also soared alongside with total numbers of visitors.

To begin with, it can be seen that by 2010 the proportion of visitors staying at cruise ships was roughly 0.3 million, however, this ratio rose to 0.5 in 2011 and reduced agin to approximately 0.3 million by 2012. After that, it started to rose steadilty and touched 1 million by 2014 before it experienced a gradual increase over the years and touched 2 million mark. Moreover, the numbers of visitors staying on island were about 0.7 million in 2010, however, these remainded contant for one year after that there was a dramatic rise in visitors number accounting 1.5 million in 2014.

Additionaly, after 2013 the numbers remain relatively same across years recording 1.5 million till 2015. Nevertheless the figures reduced to rougly 1.2 million in 2016 before rose to 1.5 million again in 2017. Further, the number of total visitors was 1 million in 2010 which continue to rose until 2016 and recorded about 2.6 million after it soared substantially to 3.5 million.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover the main series and give an overview that identifies the broad rise in cruise-ship visitors and total numbers. Several figures are also reported accurately, including the cruise-ship count reaching about 2 million in 2017 and island stays being around 1.5 million in 2014–15. However, the overview is not fully precise: cruise-ship visitors do not show a general decline, but a brief dip in 2012 before rising. The account of island visitors also says they remained at 1.5 million “till 2015,” although the figure was about 1.25 million in 2016. The total series is underdeveloped and inaccurately described as continuing to rise until 2016; it was stable at roughly 2.75 million in 2015–16. Select and compare these key stages more clearly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, an overview and two detail paragraphs. The sequence from earlier to later years is generally easy to follow, and linking expressions such as “After that,” “Moreover” and “Nevertheless” help signal relationships. However, the organisation of the data could be more purposeful: the final paragraph moves from island visitors to total visitors, and the total trend is compressed into one sentence, making the comparison less clear. Some connectors are used mechanically or do not express the relationship accurately, such as “however” between figures that are simply being contrasted. Group the series consistently and use clearer comparisons—for example, explain when cruise-ship visitors overtook island visitors, and distinguish the total’s plateau from its final rise.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of trend vocabulary, including “gradual increase,” “dramatic rise,” “reduced” and “soared substantially,” so the main changes are usually understandable. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “tourists number,” “the proportion” for a number of visitors, “numbers … accounting 1.5 million,” and “touched 2 million mark.” There are also spelling errors, including “diiferent,” “visitiors,” “steadilty” and “Additionaly,” which reduce the impression of control. Prefer precise, natural chart language such as “the number of tourists,” “stood at,” “reached,” and “rose to.” Avoid using dramatic terms where a neutral description of a gradual change is more accurate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “while,” “before” and “after,” and the overall meaning is generally clear. Some grammatical errors remain, particularly with verb forms and sentence construction. For example, “it started to rose” should be “it started to rise,” and “before rose to 1.5 million” needs a subject and finite verb, such as “before it rose to 1.5 million.” In “the number … which continue to rose,” the relative clause needs “continued to rise.” Several long sentences joined with “however” would be clearer with a full stop or a correctly punctuated conjunction. Check subject–verb agreement and keep each comparison in a complete, well-punctuated sentence.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.