Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-25

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

the line graph illustrated the amount of visitors visited a caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.

overall, the total no of individual visited the island increased over the given time period . however, the proportion of visitors stayed on cruise ship were low initially while the individuals stayed on land were higher however over the given time period the amount of visitors stayed on ship surpass the ratio of tourists staying on land.

in 2010, initially the total no of people visited the island was 1 million and this range continued to grow till 2015 where it reached to around 2.8 million and for 1 year time period from [redacted phone] it remains stabled after that it peaked to 3.5 million in 2017.

in contrast, the tourists visited the island stayed on cruise ship in 2010 were roughly around 0.3 million and with in one year time period it rose upto 0.5 million in 2011. however in 2012 it faced a downfall from 0.5 to around 0.2 and grown again to 0.5 in 2013. furthermore, it numbers continued to rose between 2013 to 2017 and it toped the visitors staying on island with a ratio of 2 million.on the other hand, the initial the amount of people stayed on island were around 0.8 million and it plateaued for one year . furthermore, from 2011 the numbers started to grow and reached to 1.5 million in 2013 from where it experienced a sustainability for around 3 years till 2015 from where it started to hit the fall and in 2016 the number falss to 1.2 however in 2017 it rose again upto 1.5 million.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the main overall rise in total visitors and describe the contrasting patterns: cruise-ship numbers grow strongly, while island-stay figures level off and fluctuate. The overview also notes that cruise visitors eventually exceed those staying on the island, which is an important comparison. Most figures are broadly accurate, including the total reaching 3.5 million in 2017 and cruise visitors reaching 2 million. To make the report more fully developed, clarify that cruise visitors first exceed island visitors in 2016, rather than leaving the timing implicit, and distinguish the total’s rise to 2.75 million in 2015–16 from its later increase. Some descriptions, such as the island-stay plateau, could be more precise about the years involved.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and two detail sections, with the total and the two visitor categories covered in a generally logical order. Comparisons such as “in contrast” and “on the other hand” help signal shifts between series. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical because several sentences begin with “furthermore” or “however,” and the long final paragraph combines many changes without clear breaks. References such as “it” and “this range” are occasionally unclear, making the reader work out which figures are being discussed. Grouping the total trend separately and then comparing the two accommodation types, with shorter sentences and clearer references, would make progression easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant trend vocabulary, including “increased,” “plateaued,” “downfall,” and “peaked,” and the reader can generally understand the intended comparisons. However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or repetitive: “the amount of visitors visited,” “the numbers started to grow,” and “it toped the visitors” do not express the data naturally. There are also spelling and form errors, including “stabled,” “falss,” and “toped.” Use precise chart language consistently, such as “the number of visitors,” “remained stable,” and “overtook.” A wider set of accurate verbs for rising, falling, and levelling off would improve clarity and make the report sound more academic.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mixture of simple and complex sentences, including clauses linked with “while,” “after that,” and “from where.” However, grammatical control is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to process. For example, “the amount of visitors visited” has an incorrect noun phrase and verb pattern, while “the total no of people visited” is missing a relative construction such as “who visited.” Subject–verb agreement and tense are also inconsistent in “it remains stabled” and “the numbers started to grow.” Several sentences run on, with punctuation missing around full stops, as in “2 million.on the other hand.” Practise accurate sentence boundaries, articles, agreement, and past-tense reporting.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.