Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-11-01

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The line chart illustrates the number of tourists visites on caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.

Over it is clear that the number prople prefer to stay at island has stagnent for year. In contrast, the people who prefer to stay at cruise ship is gradually increased. While, the total number of visitiors was significantly increased every year.

In 2010, the tourists stay at island is around 0.6 million, The people stay at cruise is bellow 0.5 which is in the bottom. The visitors at the island stable for year and in 2013 it reached their top of 1.5, after that it remained unchanged for few years. In 2016, suddenly decreased near 1.2 and after that recovered next year. On the other hand, the visiotrs who prefer to stay at cruise is increased year after year and even in between 2015 to 2016 it outnumbered the visitors who stay at island. In 2017, it's number reached at the 2 million. However, the total number of visitors at the beggining is around 1 million which is continuously rose around 2.7 million, in 2016, but after there is sudden sharp increment seen in 2017, is 3.5 million.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main overall patterns: total visitor numbers rise, island-based visitors level off after increasing, and cruise-ship visitors grow substantially. You also include relevant comparisons and several figures, such as the total reaching about 3.5 million in 2017. However, some details are inaccurate or unclear: island visitors were about 0.75 million in 2010, not 0.6, and cruise-ship visitors did not outnumber island visitors in 2015–16; they remained lower in both years. The overview’s claim that the total increased “every year” also overlooks the plateau from 2015 to 2016. The response covers the task, but these misreadings and the limited development of some comparisons keep the account from being more complete and precise.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, moving from an introduction and overview to a paragraph of year-by-year details. This helps the reader follow the broad trends. However, progression within the detail paragraph is uneven: the account shifts between island visitors, cruise passengers and the total without consistently grouping related comparisons. Connectors such as “In contrast,” “On the other hand,” and “However” are useful, but some are awkwardly placed or do not express the relationship clearly; for example, “However” introduces the final total trend without a clear contrast. Several references, including “it” and “their top,” are also unclear. Grouping the two visitor categories first and then summarising the total would make the organisation more coherent.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant trend vocabulary, including “stable,” “remained unchanged,” “decreased,” “recovered,” and “sharp increment,” so the reader can understand the main movements. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “tourists visites,” “stagnent,” “stay at cruise,” and “outnumbered” for a comparison that is not supported by the chart. Spelling errors such as “visitiors,” “visiotrs,” and “beggining” are noticeable and sometimes slow reading. Aim for precise, conventional chart language and check spelling carefully. For example, use “visitors staying on the island” and “the number rose” rather than “people prefer to stay at island” and “is increased.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mixture of simple and more complex sentences, including contrast clauses and time expressions, but control is inconsistent. Errors in verb forms and sentence construction appear in examples such as “the number … has stagnent,” “is gradually increased,” and “the total number … is continuously rose.” Articles, agreement and punctuation also need attention: “at island” lacks an article, and the sentence beginning “In 2010” contains a comma splice and an unnecessary capital after the comma. These problems sometimes make relationships between ideas harder to follow, although the intended trends are generally recoverable. Practise accurate past-tense reporting—“rose,” “remained,” and “fell”—and build longer sentences around one clear main clause.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.