Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Student answer (Band 5.5)

online soucres have become extremely popular in contemporary world. there is a considerably debate whether printed newspapers or books will replace into online or not. i stronly believe that people will prefer online information instead of physical thing.

to begin with, people can easily access a vast range of books and newspaper freely. People spend a large amount of money to buy a books. regardless of their high cost, some books are not available in physical form. it creates challenges for readers. a prime example is that, a person faces obstacle to buy prefer books in market due to its high cost and availbility. as a result, reading online books and newspaper are become people priority.

Furthermore, one of the other advantage of online sources is that people can take them in any location without any extra laggage. people can read online books in office during their free time. as a result, online information would take a good position in future.

however, we can overlook the value of physical book. online reading cause many problem that associated to eyes. it is difficult to seen on screen in a long time.

in conclusion, i firmly believe that getting online information will become major part of world in future. people would prefer online books instead of physical. because they are free of cost and easly read at ant place.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You state a clear position in the introduction—“i stronly believe” readers will prefer online sources—and return to it in the conclusion. The response also gives relevant reasons, including cost, availability, and portability, and briefly acknowledges a disadvantage of screen reading. However, the discussion is only partial and the supporting ideas remain under-developed: the example about difficulty buying books is unclear, while the point about eye problems is not explained or weighed against your main position. The prompt specifically predicts that online reading will be free, but this claim is mostly repeated rather than examined. The response is also 23 words below the required minimum, limiting the space available to develop and support your argument.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two paragraphs supporting online reading, a contrasting point, and a conclusion. Connectors such as “to begin with,” “Furthermore,” and “however” help signal the direction of the argument. At times, though, progression is mechanical or unclear. For example, “as a result” is repeated, and the link between the high cost or availability of books and the conclusion that online reading becomes a priority needs clearer explanation. The paragraph about physical books is very brief and does not develop the contrast. Use clearer links between each reason and your position, and expand the counterargument before explaining why it does not change your view.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “vast range,” “physical form,” “high cost,” and “online sources,” so the reader can generally understand your main points. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation, and spelling errors make parts of the response awkward or unclear. Examples include “online soucres,” “a considerably debate,” “extra laggage,” and “prefer books.” Some phrases are also imprecise, such as “take a good position in future” and “online information” when you mean books and newspapers. Aim for accurate topic-specific expressions and check spelling and word forms. More precise vocabulary would help you explain the advantages and disadvantages without relying on repeated general terms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple sentences and longer structures, including a conditional-style example beginning “regardless of their high cost” and a sentence introduced by “because.” However, the range is limited, and errors in sentence construction and basic grammar occur frequently enough to make some ideas difficult to follow. For example, “reading online books and newspaper are become people priority” has problems with verb form, agreement, and articles, while “it is difficult to seen on screen in a long time” has an incorrect verb pattern. Capitalisation and punctuation are also inconsistent, particularly at sentence beginnings. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement, articles, and verb forms first, then build longer sentences around one clear main clause.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.