Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-09-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In the forthcoming era, no one will purchased physical forms to read because they get everything online at zero cost. This essay completely agrees with this view because of the accessibility and convenience it will provide.

The first and foremost reason is that books and newspapers will be easier to get online than in stores. Nowadays people can get access to a wide range of information on various platforms without paying. Therefore, they do not need to spend hours in libraries and booksshops to find the reading material they want, which results in saving both time and money. In the future, this will become more common in the future with the advancements of technology. One clear example is the closure of a printed newspaper company in Pakistan, this may leads to the shortage of printed newspapers in future, shifting the next generation towards online materials.

Another compelling reason is that it is convenient to download all the study materials on smartphone via a single click. Due to this fact, people do not have to carry heavy physical form of books and they do need to allocate specific time for reading because they can ready efficiently during commuting or watching movies. In the future this trend will become more common as individuals find it to comfortable. For instance, in the future, people will become quiet busy in their jobs and household responsibilities, therefore, they would be able to keep themselves updated about the new developments and latest news online without allocating extra time reading physical books or newspapers.

In conclusion, nobody will purchase printed newspapers and books because they will be able to read everything online without spending money. I believe that this will happen because it is more accessible and convenient to read online.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by taking a clear, fully stated position in the introduction agreeing with the prompt and maintaining it throughout. The main body paragraphs present relevant ideas, such as accessibility, time-saving benefits, and convenience on smartphones. However, the development of these ideas is somewhat limited and occasionally repetitive. For instance, the example regarding the closure of a printed newspaper company in Pakistan is relevant but lacks deeper expansion. Similarly, the argument about people being too busy in the future is generalised. While the ideas are sound and directly relevant to the prompt, they tend to state points rather than fully extend them with robust supporting detail. Consequently, the performance aligns well with Band 6 descriptors for task achievement, as all parts are addressed with relevant, albeit slightly under-developed, ideas.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear introduction, two distinct body paragraphs, and a concise conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct main ideas. Cohesive devices are employed to connect sentences, using words such as 'Therefore', 'Nowadays', 'Another compelling reason', and 'For instance'. However, some referencing is slightly awkward or mechanical, such as 'Due to this fact' and repetitive use of transitional phrases like 'In the future'. Furthermore, paragraph progression is occasionally hindered by abrupt transitions between examples. While the overall logical flow is maintained and the reader can easily follow the progression of arguments, the mechanical nature of some cohesive ties keeps this criterion firmly at a Band 6 level.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The writer demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully using terms like 'accessibility', 'convenience', 'advancements of technology', and 'household responsibilities'. There are, however, several noticeable word-choice errors, grammatical infelicities, and typographical slips throughout the text. Examples include 'purchased physical forms' instead of 'purchase physical books', 'booksshops' instead of 'bookshops', 'ready efficiently' instead of 'read efficiently', and 'find it to comfortable' instead of 'find it too comfortable'. Additionally, phrases like 'printed newspaper company' could be expressed with greater precision. Although these lexical inaccuracies and spelling errors do not impede communication, they demonstrate limitations that prevent the score from reaching a higher band. The lexical resource is characteristic of a Band 6 performance.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some variety through conditional or relative clauses, such as 'because of the accessibility and convenience it will provide' and 'which results in saving both time and money'. However, there are frequent grammatical errors and tense inaccuracies that disrupt the flow. Notable errors include 'no one will purchased' (tense error), 'they get everything' (tense inconsistency), 'this may leads to' (subject-verb agreement error), 'they do need to allocate' (missing negative particle, should be 'do not need'), and 'extra time reading' (missing preposition). While complex structures are attempted, they are frequently accompanied by errors. Nevertheless, the meaning remains clear throughout, allowing the reader to follow the arguments without serious strain. These characteristics correspond closely to the Band 6 descriptors.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.