Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-09-30
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Student answer (Band 6.0)
It is often argued that printed newspapers or books will not be bought by anyone because everything is available on the internet and they will have access to any books or newspapers free of cost in the future. I largely disagree that online platforms for read books will totally diminish the traditional printed world, as printed newspapers and books allow people to read book without any distraction in peaceful area and not all well-known books available without paying anything on the internet.
To commence with the agreement, e-books and e-magazines are convenient. In other words, online based books and newspapers allow individuals to read anything anywhere or anytime, even if they are travelling, the factor they need is only the internet without carrying any book. Thus, this creates easy accessibility of any kind of books.
Shifting towards view of disagreement, it is believed that with emerging online platforms or websites for reading books, this will not completely disappear the printed books industry. The first and foremost reason is that traditional books will always an important value in reader's life because a person concentrates more effectively, when they read anything from book in a peaceful area. Hence, on electronic devices, there are several distractions like notifications so that focus may interrupt while reading on the internet.
Furthermore, e-books and online companies will create this into a business so not everything will available free of cost. To explicate this, companies will pay for access a well-named book on the internet. Apart from this, companies may start payment subscriptions, premiums or vouchers to read anything online. For example, in Japan, some online platforms get payment to give the right to read any book online. Therefore, the traditional book industry will not fully replaced with online reading platforms without paying.
In conclusion, although individuals will be able to read anything they want online because e-books are convenient and easy accessible, the internet will not fully diminished the printing industry as it provides more focused environment and not everything will available without paying.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
The candidate addresses all parts of the task by taking a clear position ('I largely disagree that online platforms for read books will totally diminish the traditional printed world'). The main arguments are identified and presented, such as convenience versus distraction-free reading, and the financial reality of accessing copyrighted materials online. However, some ideas lack full extension and suffer from minor generalisations. For example, the point about Japanese online platforms is relevant, but the explanation could be elaborated further to support the overall stance more thoroughly. Despite these minor limitations in development, the response successfully addresses the prompt overall, aligning well with the Band 6.5 to 7.0 range. A score of 6.5 is awarded as some ideas tend to be slightly under-developed.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The essay demonstrates a clear overall progression with a recognizable introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each body paragraph has a clear focus, starting with signposting language such as 'To commence with the agreement' and 'Shifting towards view of disagreement'. Cohesive devices are used, though some referencing and transitions are a bit mechanical or repetitive, such as the frequent use of 'to explicate this' or 'apart from this'. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate different arguments. While logical organisation is generally maintained, referencing is sometimes unclear, particularly with pronoun usage and clause linkage, which places this text solidly in the Band 6 category.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common lexical items such as 'diminish', 'accessibility', and 'subscriptions'. However, there are noticeable vocabulary and collocation inaccuracies throughout the text, such as 'read books' instead of 'reading books', 'not all well-known books available' lacking a verb, and 'fully replaced with' instead of 'fully replaced by'. Furthermore, spelling and word-form errors occur, such as 'easily accessible' written as 'easy accessible' and 'fully diminished' instead of 'fully diminish'. These inaccuracies do not seriously impede communication, allowing the reader to follow the argument, but they restrict the lexical score to a Band 6.0.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0
The response exhibits a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, attempting conditional and subordinate clauses (e.g., 'even if they are travelling, the factor they need is only the internet'). However, grammatical errors are frequent throughout the response. Examples include missing articles and auxiliary verbs ('printed newspapers or books will not be bought', 'books allow people to read book'), awkward phrasing ('this will not completely disappear the printed books industry'), and preposition errors ('pay for access a well-named book'). While these errors rarely completely impede communication, they persist across the text and prevent the creation of a majority of error-free sentences, making Band 6.0 an appropriate evaluation.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.