Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-06
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Some people believes that printed books and newspapers will have no buyers in the future because everything will be available online. However, I disagree that books and newspapers will vanish entirely.
Some people think due to smartphones and digital media people can read and gain information through online platforms. Numerous authors and journalists upload the breaking news and articles online and everything become digitalize. People can read news and books on free websites and specific apps. This is beneficial for the authors and journalists who post online because they can generate revenue through that content. Moreover, smartphones and internet make it easy for individuals to read online.
Furthermore, there are some advantages of uploading everything online. Authors who upload novels and articles online are paid for it. It costs them less to publish books online. Children also reach out for mobile phones for reading such articles related to their studies. In spite of that, watching screen too much can cause eye strain. It is not essential that everything should be upload on internet.
Meanwhile, saying this that newspapers and books will vanish entirely is extreme. No platform can disappear books from book center. Sometime news and articles are premium online and they ask for subscriptions as well that not everyone is willing to pay. They craves to buy them from books stores and read them. For instance, libraries still provide books for free. Consequently, the public can read them for free and increase their knowledge. Additionally, numerous people wants to gift books to their friends as well. So, I disagree with the context that books and newspapers should vanish completely in future.
In conclusion, many authors, journalists, and publishers aims to sell their books so that people can read them. Although vanishing books is not a good statement to say. Not everything is free online. Publishers somehow utilize online contents to generate income but disappearing printed articles can do bad.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
The response addresses all parts of the task and presents a clear position throughout, stating that printed books and newspapers will not vanish entirely. Relevant ideas are presented regarding digital media advantages, costs, and reasons why physical books remain popular, such as libraries and gift-giving. However, some ideas are under-developed or repetitive, such as the points about authors generating revenue and children using mobile phones for study, which do not fully extend the arguments regarding the core question of whether free online reading will completely replace purchases. To reach a higher level, the ideas would need more thorough expansion and deeper examples rather than repeating similar assertions across paragraphs.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
There is a coherent overall arrangement with a clear stance established in the introduction and reinforced in the conclusion. Paragraphing is used to separate different facets of the argument, such as digital benefits versus the enduring appeal of physical print. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical or faulty. Devices like 'Moreover', 'Furthermore', and 'Meanwhile' are used, but referencing is occasionally unclear, and the logical progression between sentences within paragraphs stumbles at times, particularly in the third body paragraph where ideas about premium content, subscriptions, and libraries are lumped together. To improve, the writer needs to ensure smoother transitions and clearer logical links between sentences.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The writer demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully attempting less common items such as 'revenue', 'subscriptions', and 'vanish entirely'. However, there are noticeable inaccuracies in word choice, collocation, and word form, such as 'everything become digitalize', 'watching screen too much', 'No platform can disappear books', and 'They craves to buy them'. Spelling and word-choice errors occur, but they rarely impede communication because the writer's core meaning remains decipherable. Developing a more precise control over collocations and word forms would elevate this criterion.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, incorporating subordinating conjunctions and conditional ideas. However, there are frequent errors in grammar and punctuation, particularly involving subject-verb agreement ('Some people believes', 'numerous people wants'), missing articles ('on internet', 'from books stores'), and awkward structural patterns ('saying this that newspapers', 'It is not essential that everything should be upload'). While these errors do not completely obscure the message, they occur with enough frequency to hold the score back. Greater control over basic agreements, verb forms, and article usage is needed to achieve error-free complex sentences.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.