Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-11-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is often discussed that in the future people will prefer to read online over buying books or printing newspapers. There are many people who believe that everything will be digital in the future but I disagree with this opinion. I believe that reading from a hard copy is a better way of consuming knowledge.

There are many people, especially aged population who prefer to read a book or a printed newspaper as they find it more comfortable. Elderly population takes time to adapt to the changes for instance, my grandmother, we gifted her a smartphone and taught her how to use it to read books but she still prefers to read newspapers and physical books. There are many young people as well who prefer to read from printed books for their exams. For example, one of my friends can't read stuff online for a long time else she gets a headache.

There are many disadvanatges of longer screen time. When one reads online, they can get distracted easily by other content, having more screen time affects vision and reduces focus. However, when someone reads from a physical book, they are more focused and understands in a better way.

In conclusion, while deciding if one wants to but a book or newspaper of read it online, one should look at the pros and cons. Buying a good book is a good investment. One should look at their financial condition before making a decision. There are many different ways of consuming content and one should prioritise their comfort. People won't be able to read stuff online for a longer time and the trend of buying books and reading from a hard copy will remain alive in the future as well.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you disagree that printed material will disappear, and the conclusion restates that view. You support it with relevant examples, including older readers who find print comfortable and a friend who experiences headaches when reading online. This addresses the central question, and the personal examples make the argument accessible. However, the discussion does not fully examine the claim that online reading will be free, and the final paragraph shifts towards advising readers to weigh cost and comfort rather than directly explaining why printed books and newspapers will continue to be bought. Some points, such as improved focus with print, would benefit from fuller explanation or evidence to make the case more convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs give reasons, and a conclusion returns to your position. Examples are generally placed alongside the points they support, and linking expressions such as “For example” and “However” help readers follow the argument. At times, though, progression is weakened by repeated openings such as “There are many people” and “There are many,” which make the paragraphs feel list-like. The conclusion also introduces financial condition and personal comfort without clearly connecting these ideas to the claim about free online content. Use topic sentences that identify each paragraph’s main reason, and link each example explicitly back to why print will remain in use.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use adequate vocabulary to communicate your position and relevant ideas, including “hard copy,” “adapt,” “distracted,” and “pros and cons.” These choices show some range beyond basic statements, and the meaning is generally clear. However, several expressions are repetitive or imprecise, such as “stuff online,” “consuming knowledge,” and “a good book is a good investment.” There are also spelling errors, including “disadvanatges,” which reduce accuracy. Aim for more precise terms related to the topic, such as “digital publications,” “screen-based reading,” and “printed materials,” and check spelling carefully. More varied, natural collocations would help the argument sound more formal and controlled.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “people … who prefer to read” and a conditional structure in “When one reads online.” Most sentences remain understandable, but some grammatical errors affect accuracy. For example, “Elderly population takes time” needs an article, and “they are more focused and understands” has a subject–verb agreement error. The sentence about your grandmother is also awkwardly joined: “for instance, my grandmother, we gifted her…” would be clearer as two sentences or with a properly formed clause. In the conclusion, “if one wants to but a book or newspaper of read it online” contains errors that obscure the intended structure. Review agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.