Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-03

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The given pie chart compares the Anthropology graduates from one university did after completing their undergraduate degree course and the table illustrates the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years .

Overall , it can be observed that the mostly anthropology students preferred full time jobs . whereas, part time jobs + postgrudate study pursued by minor people . By contrast, government sector was earned a highest amount.

Turning to the details, Full time jobs were highly choosen by students which recorded at 52%. people who preferred full time post graduate study and not know were accounted to 8% each .

In addition, part time work and unemployment shared a similar percentage which stood at 15% and 12% respectively. part time work + study minor recorded at 5%.

Movingfurther, Government sector was the dominant souce of income which was accounted to 5% and climbed significantly to 50% in highest amount. moreover , freelance consultants had the second highest compensation which was rise 5% to 40% in $[redacted phone]. private companies accounted to 30% which was least wages in

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses the task only partially, as some parts are inadequately covered or misunderstood. While the overview attempts to summarize the main trends, it contains inaccuracies and confusion regarding the data, such as stating that the government sector 'was earned a highest amount' in terms of salaries, which misinterprets the table showing salary distribution percentages. Key features are selected, but details are sometimes reported incorrectly, such as stating private companies accounted for 'least wages in' without finishing the thought, or misreading the increments in the salary table. To reach a higher level, the response needs to provide a more accurate and fully developed selection of main features without misinterpreting the underlying data points in the charts.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response demonstrates some organisation with a clear attempt at paragraphing, separating the introduction, overview, and body details. However, there is a lack of clear overall progression and smooth linking between sentences. Cohesive devices are sometimes mechanical or misused, such as 'Movingfurther,' and the referencing is occasionally unclear, as seen in abrupt shifts between the pie chart data and the table data. Paragraphing is present, but internal cohesion within paragraphs can be repetitive and disjointed. To improve, the writer should ensure that ideas flow logically from one sentence to the next using accurate, natural cohesive ties and clearer signposting.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited and minimally adequate for the task, with noticeable errors in word choice and collocation that occasionally cause difficulty for the reader. Phrases such as 'minor people' instead of a small minority, 'not know' instead of 'not known', and 'dominant souce of income' instead of employment sector indicate a restricted lexical range. There are also awkward word formations like 'postgrudate' and clumsy phrasing such as 'least wages in'. To achieve a higher band, the writer must expand their vocabulary range and use less common lexical items more accurately and naturally, paying closer attention to proper word forms and collocations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response exhibits a limited range of structures, relying mostly on simple sentences and basic descriptive patterns, while attempts at complex sentences are frequently faulty. There are frequent errors in grammar and punctuation throughout the text, including subject-verb agreement issues like 'Anthropology graduates ... did after', missing articles, incorrect prepositions, and awkward passive constructions such as 'were highly choosen by students which recorded at 52%' and 'which was rise 5% to 40%'. Punctuation errors also appear, such as unnecessary spaces before punctuation marks. To progress, the writer needs to increase sentence variety and maintain greater accuracy across basic and complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.